But of course we all know that the big manufacturers don’t do this not because they can’t but because they don’t want to. Planned obsolescence is still very much the name of the game, despite all the bullshit they spout about sustainability.

  • restingboredface@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    119
    ·
    10 months ago

    What I don’t get is how no company seems to have worked out a legitimately good service and maintenance model for tech products. Fairphone hasn’t invented the wheel here. They’re going to make money on maintenance, parts and repair.

    I would think there would be lowered costs involved in not having to push out a new product every 6 months and market it to customers who just bought something less than a year ago.

    • Diplomjodler@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      105
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      The business models of the current tech giants are very much based on planned obsolescence. Selling you a gadget for $ 1000 every two years will always be more profitable than selling you one very five years and doing service in the meantime.

      • kirklennon@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        22
        ·
        10 months ago

        Selling you a gadget for $ 1000 every two years will always be more profitable than selling you one very five years and doing service in the meantime.

        Are you aware that the current version of iOS is supported by the phones Apple released in 2018? And they’re still releasing security updates for the prior version, with support for 2017’s iPhone 8?

        • umbrella@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          56
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          and thats fine until you need replacement for a cracked screen or a bad battery and you find out its almost as expensive as a brand new phone. it good that they are doing it but software is just 50% of the problem.

          • TheFriar@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            25
            ·
            10 months ago

            This is before you even get into the ewaste and limited precious metals

          • AlternateRoute@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            Even for unrepairable, at fault replacement(you stepped on it) apple will normally sell you a reconditioned perfect replacement for 50% the cost.

            Reliable repair and ultrafast swap and restore are one off the reasons I stick with apple.

            In no case is it ever “ almost the price of a new one”.

            • umbrella@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              ill repost this for good measure:

              thats the price of another equivalent, or a decent brand new android.

          • kirklennon@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            10 months ago

            A battery replacement from Apple itself for an iPhone 8 is $69. You can get third-party replacements for less. They actually offer battery replacements going back to the 5s (released in 2013) and screen repairs going back to the iPhone 6.

            A decade of first-party hardware support for the most likely to fail components in a phone is pretty hard to square with allegations of “planned obsolescence.”

            • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              Perhaps the easier argument is that they try to create a sense of urgency to sell people what they don’t need.

              Hmm, I wonder what the latest iPhone would look like if Apple were on a once every two years release schedule instead of annual. I can see arguments for the same, better, and worse.

              • turmacar@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                10 months ago

                I’ve always been Android, but the easy counter is just “why do people feel the need to replace their working phone every year.”

                Car companies have a new model every year and even among those who could afford to, very few people feel the need to have an annual car upgrade cycle. Products aren’t (/shouldn’t be) fashion.

                Apple’s got a weird cult thing going, partly because the first few generations were legitimately large upgrades. I’d be curious about the stats of how many non-influencers actually upgrade annually.

                • daltotron@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  I’d be curious about the stats of how many non-influencers actually upgrade annually.

                  Ahh, but that’s the trick, because by saying “non-influncers”, you’d be cutting out the peoples who fancy themselves influencers, or act like influencers, which is apparently everyone now.

              • kirklennon@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                they try to create a sense of urgency to sell people what they don’t need.

                Do they? Yes, they certainly advertise what’s new but they’re not primarily targeting customers with last year’s phone. I recall seeing previously that the average time to keep an iPhone is three years. On Apple’s iPhone 15 product page, I found two spots where it called out direct comparisons to previous iPhones: “A17 Pro GPU is up to 70% faster than the GPU in iPhone 12 Pro” and “iPhone 15 Pro has up to 6 more hours video playback than iPhone 12 Pro.” They’re targeting upgrades to the newest flagship at people with the flagship from three years ago. Of course due to the long support for iPhones, that three year iPhone will inevitably end up in the hands of another user, where it will continue to live on, so there’s nothing at all wasteful about upgrading. It’s not even wasteful to upgrade every single year because those year-old phones are still used. It’s only when the phone is irreparably broken or hopelessly, legitimately obsolete (due to still rapidly-improving technology) that it’s then recycled (and Apple has developed special robots to make extracting the rare earth metals viable at large scale).

                I wonder what the latest iPhone would look like if Apple were on a once every two years release schedule instead of annual.

                I think it would look exactly the same as it does today except that it would include two years’ of innovations and changes rather than one, but would also mean that if you needed a new phone before its release, your only option would be an increasingly dated model. Customer: Hi, I’d like the latest flagship. Store: Here’s the best technology that was available 20 months ago.

                I also think it’s worth noting that Apple pretty much single-handedly slowed the release schedule for phones. Prior to the iPhone, Nokia was releasing roughly a dozen barely-differentiated models per year, spread throughout the year.

                • OrangeJoe@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  I think it’s entirely possible that they chose to compare to a 3 year old phone not because they are only targeting those upgrades to people with 3 years old phones, but because it sounds a lot more impressive that way instead of just the smaller incremental improvements over last years model.

                  It should also be noted that Apple admitted at one point to purposefully slowing down older iPhones too, which very clearly was done to get people to upgrade. If that’s not planned obsolescence I don’t know what is.

                  You talk about them as if they are some benevolent entity, when that’s just very much not the case.

            • umbrella@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              most people will probably need to pay someone to do it for them too.

              and it aint close to being that “cheap” in my country.

              • kirklennon@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                There’s no “too.” This is the (US) price to have Apple themselves replace your battery for you with a new OEM battery, inclusive of the battery and labor. It basically represents the highest available cost.

                • umbrella@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  you can pretty much get another one for the price they want here (cracked screen):

          • le_saucisson_masquay@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Well Say whatever about apple but my grandma is running an iPhone 5 for years, replaced the battery from a third party repair shop last year and it keep working absolutely perfectly. There was absolutely no issue finding someone to replace it and it costs 40€.

            But yeah, if we had bought her a shity android third grade phone, support would be long gone and the thing barely working. Would have bought one or two other phone in the meantime.

            • tabular@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              Apple go out of their way to make it difficult for 3rd parties repair shops to get parts and same goes for “official” repair partners who are also gimped in what they’re allowed to repair.

              I imagine this isn’t want you meant when you said say whatever you will about Apple.

              • le_saucisson_masquay@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                It’s not so much that I’m praising apple but that I’m criticizing android manufacturers. You can make it as much repairable as you want, if you stop updating after 2 year it’s as good as dead.

                I know we could have bought her a pixel, but they got their own issue. And not so much repairable.

                Samsung back in these time, it was 2 year update too and Im not sure even today they keep updating their low end phone for much longer than that. Wouldn’t buy a s23 for a grandma that only makes call and some internet search. 😀

                • tabular@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Other than a lack of security updates, what does it matter if the OS isn’t updated such that it is unusable?

            • Specal@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              That’s fine for the iPhone 5 before they got as greedy as they are in modern times. Latest generation iPhones have parts locked to the motherboard of the phone, making it alot harder for 3rd party technicians to make repairs without bricking the phone. I forget the name of the YouTuber I think it’s Louis Hoffman, he goes into alot more detail on this.

              But you are right in a sense, if you never break your phone, it’ll last until the battery does. If you get it repaired at a 3rd party shop that’s not apple certified (a really expensive certification to get, not just for upfront cash but they restrict what you’re allowed to work on to keep the certification) you risk walking away with a very expensive paper weight

            • Johanno@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Apple is on it’s best way to kill all 3rd party repair shops. Luis Rossman has many videos about it. Basically you don’t get any schematics, Apple makes it illegal for you to buy replacement parts and they make it more difficult to repair anything.

        • tabular@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Apple got in trouble for lowering CPU speed with a software update. They said it’s to help old batteries but it made the experience noticable worse so it appeared like they tried to make getting a new phone more appealing by gimping old ones.

          Updating proprietary software need not be in the user’s best interests.

    • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      The costs (overhead) are too high. They make more by simply manufacturing and selling.

      Otherwise they’d be doing it.

      • Pistcow@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’m wondering about that. I’ve worked with several manufacturers, and their most profitable segment is parts. If you ever want to get the highest annual bonus, work for the parts devision.

        • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          10 months ago

          Manufacturers of what? Selling and replacing car parts is a much different proposition than trying to replace semiconductors inside an earbud.

          • GamingChairModel@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            If the thing you’re selling costs $100,000, a separate parts stream makes sense, because the skilled labor that goes into replacing parts in a used device is worth the cost, compared to throwing it all away and starting with the new thing.

            If the thing costs $100 and skilled worker time is at $50/hour, there’s just not much room for repairs to be cost effective, and repairs then become more of a reflection of one’s internal values around reducing waste or tinkering for fun than an economically feasible activity.

          • Pistcow@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            Anything that’s repairable is by component (main board, sound card, battery, camera, case, etc.). It was nice when we could swap batteries in cellphones. I have a Samsung S24 Ultra that came with a promise of 7 years of updates but the battery will degrade well before that and will cost $200-300 to pay a repair shop to replace because of the need of specialized tools. With my old Samsung Note 1, I could get a new battery for $20.

            • CyberSeeker@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              10 months ago

              Why do you think they all opposed right to repair?

              And specifically, right to open repair? They’ll happily send you a $600 TPM-locked biometric sensor, because they would control the market and ROI, but won’t let you buy a $90 alternative from someone else.

            • Dojan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              What? Why would the battery replacement cost $200-300? That seems a bit out there; authorised Apple resellers here replaces iPhone batteries for $80, that’s work and battery. That’s digestible at least, but still unreasonable in my opinion. I’d prefer to return to the days of feature phones where you could slip off the back and just slot in a new battery you picked up at the local electric parts store for $15-30.