ANNOUNCEMENT: defederating effective immediately from lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works - Beehaw
beehaw.org
hey folks, weā€™ll be quick and to the point with this one: ##### we have made the decision to defederate from lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works. we recognize this is hugely inconvenient for a wide variety of reasons, but we think this is a decision we need to take immediately. the remainder of the post details our thoughts and decision-making on why this is necessary. ā€” we have been concerned with how sustainable the explosion of new users on Lemmy isā€“particularly with federation in mindā€“basically since it began. i have already related [https://beehaw.org/post/520044?scrollToComments=true] how difficult dealing with the explosion has been just constrained to this instance for us four Admins, and increasingly weā€™re being confronted with external vectors we have to deal with that have further stressed our capabilities (elaborated on below). an unfortunate reality weā€™ve also found is we just donā€™t have the tools or the time here to parse out all the good from all the bad. all we have is a nuke and some pretty rudimentary mod powers that donā€™t scale well. we have a list of improvements weā€™d like to see both on the moderation side of Lemmy and federation if at all possibleā€“but weā€™re unanimous in the belief that we canā€™t wait on what we want to be developed here. separately, we want to do this now, while the band-aid can be ripped off with substantially less pain. aside from/complementary to whatā€™s mentioned above, our reason for defederating, by and large, boils down to: - these two instancesā€™ open registration policy, which is extremely problematic for us given how federation works and how trivial it makes trolling, harassment, and other undesirable behavior; - the disproportionate number of moderator actions we take against users of these two instances, and the general amount of time we have to dedicate to bad actors on those two instances; - our need to preserve not only a moderated community but a vibe and general feeling this is actually a safe space for our users to participate in; - and the reality that fulfilling our ethos is simply not possible when we not only have to account for our own users but have to account for literally tens of thousands of new, completely unvetted users, some of whom explicitly see spaces like this as desirable to troll and disrupt and others of whom simply donā€™t care about what our instance stands for as Gaywallet puts it, in our discussion of whether to do this: > Thereā€™s a lot of soft moderating that happens, where people step in to diffuse tense situations. But itā€™s not just that, thereā€™s a vibe that comes along with it. Most people need a lot of trust and support to open up, and itā€™s really hard to trust and support whoā€™s around you when there are bad actors. People shut themselves off in various ways when thereā€™s more hostility around them. Theyā€™ll even shut themselves off when thereā€™s fake nice behavior around. Thereā€™s a lot of nuance in modding a community like this and itā€™s not just where we take moderator actions- sometimes people need to step in to diffuse, to negotiate, to help people grow. This only works when everyone is on the same page about our ethos and right now we canā€™t even assess that for people who arenā€™t from our instance, so weā€™re walking a tightrope by trying to give everyone the benefit of the doubt. That isnā€™t sustainable forever and especially not in the face of massive growth on such a short timeframe. > > Explicitly safe spaces in real life typically arenā€™t open to having strangers walk in off the street, even if they have a bouncer to throw problematic people out. A single negative interaction might require a lot of energy to undo. and, to reiterate: we understand that a lot of people legitimately and fairly use these instances, and this is going to be painful while itā€™s in effect. but we hope you can understand why weā€™re doing this. our words, when we talk about building something better here, are not idle platitudes, and we are not out to build a space that grows at any cost. we want a better space, and we think this is necessary to do that right now. if you disagree we understand that, but we hope you can if nothing else come away with the understanding it was an informed decision. this is also not a permanent judgement (or a moral one on the part of either communityā€™s owner, i should addā€“we just have differing interests here and thatā€™s fine). in the future as tools develop, cultures settle, attitudes and interest change, and the wave of newcomers settles down, weā€™ll reassess whether we feel capable of refederating with these communities. thanks for using our site folks.

Interesting bit of news for the threadiverse. All three of these are fairly large lemmy instances

  • bill_1992@kbin.social
    23Ā·
    2 years ago

    Some of yā€™all getting angry need to look at yourself in the mirror. The whole point of federation was to allow communities to do things like this if they want.

    A lot of new people are going to see this mudslinging and rightfully turn around. Nobody is coming to Lemmy to see drama between instances.

    • smartman97@kbin.social
      5Ā·
      2 years ago

      I thought the whole point of federation was that everything from every federated instance was connected and I only need one account to see every part of it. The fact that federation has been the only discussion since the blackout is not good for the alternatives to reddit. My whole life is tech and if itā€™s this distracting to me I canā€™t imagine any remotely average user being interested. The fact that this was the perfect time to be part of an alternative but the whole experience has mostly just proven reddits ā€œgive it a weekā€ response true.

      • ParkingPsychology@kbin.social
        16Ā·
        2 years ago

        I thought the whole point of federation was that everything from every federated instance was connected and I only need one account to see every part of it.

        That was never going to happen, not even in the best possible case.

        Far left and far right are always going to split off. Do you want to be having discussions about race with neo nazis? I donā€™t. Let them go to their own dark corner of the internet.

      • SQL_InjectMe@partizle.com
        6Ā·
        2 years ago

        I thought the whole point of federation was that everything from every federated instance was connected and I only need one account to see every part of it.

        No. If an instance hosts toxic communities then your instance can choose to defederate from it. You donā€™t have to wait for the centralized authority to ban them. Itā€™s about being able to choose your admins and form a web of ā€œgoodā€ communities.

      • Noki@kbin.social
        2Ā·
        2 years ago

        kbin is only live a month or soā€¦ of course there will be problems and missing moderation tools - it wont be much better for lemmy.

        There is no perfect time - some people will stay some will go back to reddit witout any change. thats a user thing not the fault of beehaw or the federation of servers.

    • spaduf@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
      2Ā·
      2 years ago

      I do think itā€™s fair to criticize the decision to try to be one of the largest instances while only having four moderators. They should have accepted a place as a midsize instance with midsize communities in order to maintain their moderation goals. Or they could have worked to get more moderators. Blaming the defederated instances and mod tools seem disingenuous at best. That said mod tools undoubtedly need improvement.

      • yozul@kbin.social
        6Ā·
        2 years ago

        To be fair, they said the reason they were defederating from those two instances in particular is because most of their moderation involved people from them. They didnā€™t expand beehaw beyond what they could handle, the rest of lemmy expanded beyond what they could handle. If this really is just a temporary measure, which is also what they said, then I think itā€™s pretty reasonable.

        • spaduf@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          1Ā·
          2 years ago

          Thatā€™s because they defederated from the two largest competing instances. Iā€™m talking about the communities users not the instances. The issue is that beehaw has the largest and therefore defacto default communities. The timing is bad and will likely affect wider adoption. The biggest problem is that it is entirely foreseeable and solved by either accepting a smaller community (closing signups) or improving moderation capabilities (getting more moderators or investing in an alternative moderation system) before it meant splitting the threadiverse in half.

          • yozul@kbin.social
            5Ā·
            2 years ago

            Iā€™m not denying that it sucks, but if youā€™d told anybody this was going to happen a month ago theyā€™d have just laughed at you. Of course they were unprepared. Everbody has more than they can deal with. Adding more mods isnā€™t as simple as picking some names out of a hat, and this isnā€™t a thing anyone was preparing for. There currently are no alternative moderation systems, everything is too new and until recently was all way to small for that to be important, and they just have more work then they can deal with trying to suddenly moderate all of the threadiverse.

            This was a bad option that sucked, but every option was a bad option that sucked. Iā€™m more concerned with how they deal with things as they normalize over the coming weeks and months than I am with how theyā€™re trying to put out the fires in the short term.

            • spaduf@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
              0Ā·
              2 years ago

              But they chose a nonstandard moderation strategy that limited their ability to scale moderation with users. The default system is that communities are moderated independently of admins (not saying admins donā€™t form communities or that thereā€™s no overlap between admins and mods) whereas on beehaw only the admins can create communities and therefore are the primary moderators.

              Now Iā€™m not saying that thereā€™s anything inherently wrong with the system theyā€™ve chosen but the fact that it is nonstandard and in fact built into the core precept of beehaw means that this was easily foreseen.

              • yozul@kbin.social
                5Ā·
                2 years ago

                Easily forseen if you knew that lemmy was suddenly going to have a hundred times as many users in the space of a couple weeks. That was the thing no one was prepared for though.

      • surrendertogravity@beehaw.orgEnglish
        3Ā·
        2 years ago

        The admins have always been clear that theyā€™re not trying to replace Reddit, and Iā€™m quite sure they were not trying to be one of the largest instances.

        If they werenā€™t trying to get large then how did that happen? Based on admin comments, beehaw was one of the more active instances when the first wave of migration happened; and a decent amount of the pre-first wave posts about lemmy I saw on Reddit were about how Beehaw was a good instance to join as it was defederated from lemmygrad.

        • spaduf@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
          0Ā·
          2 years ago

          Iā€™m not saying this has anything to do with replacing reddit but it is bad for the larger threadiverse community. Notably there were several other instances that closed registration for the purposes of not growing quicker than they could handle long term (see lemmy.ml). Beehaw has most of the largest (and therefore defacto default) communities. Active steps to avoid that would have allowed them to maintain their moderation goals while growing in an organic and sustainable way that benefits the larger threadiverse community.

          • surrendertogravity@beehaw.orgEnglish
            2Ā·
            2 years ago

            I was strictly replying to the part of your comment where you said they made a decision to try to be one of the largest instances ā€“ imo they did not make a explicit decision to try to be that, but rather the growth was a side effect of the circumstances around reddit users checking out the fediverse.

            Is closing registrations is better than having an application with questions that weed out low-effort users? IMO itā€™s probably a wash. beehaw has only banned one user from the local instance that I know of, so the application process seems to be working overall. The issue is that other instances are growing too quickly and needing to moderate those users, not their own.

            I do agree this isnā€™t great for the threadiverse and I wish it hadnā€™t come to this, both on a personal and community level. I was subbed to the knitting community on lemmy.world, it was the most active of those communities that I saw, and now Iā€™m locked out. Idk if I want to move to an alt on a different instance, or self-host my own so that Iā€™m fully in control of what I can see, or what. :S

            • spaduf@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
              0Ā·
              2 years ago

              No the issue is that four moderators for the whole instance was always unsustainable and allowing the communities to become the defacto defaults without growing the mod teams was a bad idea. This was easily foreseen and corrected. Blaming other instances is not at all fair.

              • Noki@kbin.social
                3Ā·
                2 years ago

                you do not understand the problem. The growth was on every server of the fedivers - so moderationg users from different servers was to much work. how should they stop people from other servers? two options - block any individuell(which is to much work with so many open registration servers - they can just spamm new servers) or nuke the server where most of the trolls come from.

                • spaduf@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
                  2Ā·
                  2 years ago

                  I DO understand the problem. They only have an issue with an influx of users because they are the largest (defacto default) communities. A position that was incompatible with their moderation system from the get go. Had they had more sustainably sized communities none of this would have been an issue.

    • Cylusthevirus@kbin.social
      1Ā·
      2 years ago

      I mean some people absolutely do love and feed on drama, but is that who we want to attract? Theyā€™re not the nicest bunch to have around in my experience.

    • eta_aquarid@kbin.social
      1Ā·
      2 years ago

      exactly this; the whole point was so instances could pick and choose who they wanted to interact with

      Iā€™d always heard that federation was good because if you get an instance infested with fascists, you (and everyone else who doesnā€™t want anything to do with them) can just cut that instance loose and let it drift away

      I guess others thought different?

  • BaroqueInMind@kbin.social
    7Ā·
    2 years ago

    This simply solidifies my opinion that Iā€™ve had all along that Beehaw is a trash instance full of sensitive censor-happy ninnies and I hope they all resolve the issues they are having to eventually be finally free from trolls and assholes in their humble & beautiful walled-garden paradise echo chamber. All the best for them.

    • bill_1992@kbin.social
      27Ā·
      2 years ago

      Isnā€™t the whole point of the fediverse that you get to create and craft your experience for your community? Thereā€™s a really good reason defederating is a feature. I donā€™t get it, Beehaw decides to use the features of federation so now we: firstly become tribalistic (them vs us), and secondly decide to get angry? Like it or not, this is what you signed up for when you wanted federation.

      I donā€™t see the point of getting angry like this, and really donā€™t see how this negativity being conducive to a thriving community. Some new people are going to explore fediverse, see tribalistic mudslinging among instances, and say ā€œnot for me.ā€

      Iā€™d say respect their decision and move on, if itā€™s not for you itā€™s not for you.

      • Leigh@beehaw.org
        10Ā·
        2 years ago

        Absolutely. Itā€™s disappointing that this person read a post made by the Beehaw admins that was written with nuance and grace, and then decided to respond with vitriol. Thatā€™s exactly the kind of attitude that is so prolific on Reddit, and I am happy to leave it behind. Thank you for your reasoned reply.

        OP, I encourage you in the future to choose grace.

        • Ski@kbin.social
          6Ā·
          2 years ago

          This kind of post right here is the gold standard for why I chose Kbin over other instances. Well reasoned, free of vitriol, and looking to build a new culture outside of the one a lot of us left behind on Reddit.

        • BaroqueInMind@kbin.social
          2Ā·
          2 years ago

          Vitriol is a strong word to describe what I said about Beehaw. I do not hold a bitter spite to what Beehaw did, in fact I understand and accept their decision as prudent and appropriate for their community.

          I simply hate how they act benevolent where the reality is the opposite; that their admins are legitimately overlords akin to a full-time power-abusing reddit moderator.

          Regarding your comment that I need to act with more grace, my apologies. You are correct, I should be less aggressive in my opinions and will self-censor henceforth to protect and maintain the humility of the discussions that occur here.

          • Leigh@beehaw.org
            1Ā·
            2 years ago

            I simply hate how they act benevolent where the reality is the opposite; that their admins are legitimately overlords akin to a full-time power-abusing reddit moderator.

            What do you mean by this? Do you have examples? Maybe youā€™re correct and I just havenā€™t seen it, but every example Iā€™ve seen of them responding to something has been great.

            Regarding your comment that I need to act with more grace, my apologies. You are correct, I should be less aggressive in my opinions and will self-censor henceforth to protect and maintain the humility of the discussions that occur here.

            Donā€™t sweat it, brother. <3

        • eta_aquarid@kbin.social
          1Ā·
          2 years ago

          yeah, this is the weird thing; Beehawā€™s reasonings are incredibly reasonable, and theyā€™re not saying that the other parts of Lemmy arenā€™t good enough for them, which is what I think a lot of people are getting mad at

          that and thinking that theyā€™re entitled to access to Beehaw

      • zalack@kbin.social
        8Ā·
        2 years ago

        Yeah, theyā€™re saying ā€œlook, we only have four mods, have a highly targeted type of community we are trying to build, and have had to disproportionately moderate users from these instancesā€ which seems reasonable on itā€™s face.

        Thatā€™s kind of the beauty of Lemmy/Kbin right? You can spin up an instance with whatever rules you want. I think people are reacting to the fact that during the Reddit exodus Beehaw kind of looked like a ā€œdefaultā€ general instance, including me.

        But thatā€™s a misreading on our part, not them going back on that.

      • BreadDog@kbin.socialOP
        5Ā·
        2 years ago

        Its both a value add and a negative. For those more focused on their own community (Like beehaw) itā€™s an obvious positive. But for many users, losing access to certain communities on your own instance of choice is going to be a negative. I personally donā€™t blame Beehaw for favoring the former. I think improved moderation tools and more granular federation would at least make the move less of a blow to users.

      • Noki@kbin.social
        4Ā·
        2 years ago

        100% - the beauty of the fedivers is that everybody can chose to federatre OR NOT!

        If people wanne follow beehaw they can switch server or even go to some other fedivers project and follow from there.

      • eta_aquarid@kbin.social
        1Ā·
        2 years ago

        Isnā€™t the whole point of the fediverse that you get to create and craft your experience for your community? Thereā€™s a really good reason defederating is a feature. I donā€™t get it, Beehaw decides to use the features of federation so now we: firstly become tribalistic (them vs us), and secondly decide to get angry? Like it or not, this is what you signed up for when you wanted federation.

        Yes, exactly

        like weā€™re not owed Beehawā€™s cooperation; itā€™s their instance and if the users want to do this then thatā€™s their perogative

        Regardless, this is being blown out of proportion; Beehaw outright said that this was temporary

    • dan1101@lemmy.world
      11Ā·
      2 years ago

      Yeah I donā€™t feel quite as harshly but as soon as I saw they didnā€™t allow downvotes I knew their philosophy wasnā€™t for me. Too bad about losing their gaming group though.

      • Captain_Wtv@lemmy.world
        3Ā·
        2 years ago

        Iā€™ll be honest, itā€™s weird to not allow downvotes but be on a federated site. Idk if Iā€™m weird or if thatā€™s just me tho. Like if you go to beehaw from another Lemmy instance you can downvote them.

        • Noki@kbin.social
          5Ā·
          2 years ago

          most of the fedivers has no downvote - please be respectfulll of the diferences.

    • lamentforicarus@kbin.social
      2Ā·
      2 years ago

      I have a beehaw account. Iā€™ve only experienced one user whoā€™s a bit too intense about their thoughts. Everyone else has just been chill. The admin arenā€™t defederating from lemmy.ml, the other big instance, and have no plans to do so. They really were just overwhelmed by the two feds they blocked because of trollish users. Itā€™s not as intense as you make it sound.

    • DigiWolf@kbin.social
      1Ā·
      2 years ago

      Thatā€™s been my view too. Thereā€™s definitely a need for moderation, but Iā€™ve been on the internet for quite some time and the vibe from Beehaw is very much concerning. Any time Iā€™ve seen a community run like that, it always always ends up feeling like an echochamber run by a dictator. I want an internet thatā€™s mostly wholesome, not a ā€œhappy fun camp where thereā€™s all smiles and you had better not frown!ā€

    • geoffervescent@kbin.social
      1Ā·
      2 years ago

      I think itā€™s great. I want an account there for the occassions when I want to visit a safe space or a SFW website. It doesnt have to be your identity. You can go to different instances in different contexts, for different modes of interaction. And a third unrelated instance can remain federated with them both, if thatā€™s amenable to all parties.

  • ANuStart@kbin.social
    5Ā·
    2 years ago

    The sad reality is that during the reddit blackout, people were pushing lemmy (specifically Beehaw) as the reddit replacement because yay decentralized, federated, fun!

    For a lot of those reddit refugees the effort they put into making content and trying to make Beehaw their home is gone now.

    Theyā€™re not going to want to start all over at a new instance and rebuild yet again.

    Theyā€™re just going to go back to reddit

    • Briskfall@kbin.social
      1Ā·
      2 years ago

      I feel like the concept of ā€œdecentralisationā€ is good for the consuming users and people who want to discuss an interesting topic/subject, but not really for OC/content craetorsā€¦ They just want their work to be as exposed to as many people as possible (exposure -> more clients -> bigger brand/value -> profit???), and defederalisating goes against that principle.

    • eric5949@beehaw.org
      1Ā·
      2 years ago

      Exactly. Iā€™ve been trying to rebuild my account on lemmy.world but itā€™s disenheartening and honestly makes me want to not bother. The answer isnt defederating, the answer is find some mods.

    • eta_aquarid@kbin.social
      1Ā·
      2 years ago

      I think the issue is that everyoneā€™s so focused on seeing Lemmy as a ā€œnotRedditā€ that they outright get pissed when it doesnā€™t work the way they think it should (like Reddit except the parts they think are bad)

      Lemmy (and kbin, and other similar platforms) and Reddit have the same niche, but theyā€™re not the same thing

  • mitch@beehaw.org
    3Ā·
    2 years ago

    I think this is a fair choice for Beehaw to make, but I am frustrated that now I have less content to read. I wish we had better community discovery tools.

  • experbia@kbin.social
    3Ā·
    2 years ago

    All this talk of defederation and blocklists makes me generally uneasy. I understand how itā€™s easy to fall into. Nobody wants political extremists and criminals and bad actors and stuff on their instance, so it makes sense you might want to ban trollfactory dot xyz, nazihq dot us, and/or uncompromisingmarxist dot boats, or whatever.

    But I think the stupidest shit I saw on reddit were the subreddits that would ban you for even posting on an ideologically competing subreddit, with no consideration for the message youā€™d written. This is worse than that because itā€™s the opposite, and includes even reading the content.

    Imagine if when you went to post on /r/RestaurantOwners, and its AutoMod had the power to then immediately ban you from even looking at /r/antiwork and /r/WorkReform. Imagine posting to /r/conservative to correct someoneā€™s error only to get permanently banned from viewing any ā€œleftistā€ subs ever again. This is the vibe I get from this and as much as I want to avoid creating nodules of extremism and hatred, I want less to have people grabbing my head, taping my mouth, and averting my eyes from things they donā€™t like when they donā€™t even know what my thinking is.

    I feel like widespread trigger happy banlists are the death of small instances, too. Maybe one small instance doesnā€™t catch some newly registered asshole for a day or two but itā€™s too late. The 16-hour a day lifestyle moderator on a massive instance who has gangstalking delusions over nebulous ā€œtrollsā€ has already blacklisted all 150 of your users permanently and listed your domain for defederation as officially owned by the Nazi party in a massive register shared by the top 100 largest instances. The number of times Iā€™ve heard this story with small Mastodon instances is more than I care for.

    • Sentrovasi@kbin.social
      2Ā·
      2 years ago

      Youā€™re not banned from looking at anything. Just go to their instance, abide by their signup rules and donā€™t do the shit they defederated to avoid.

    • Captain_Wtv@lemmy.world
      1Ā·
      2 years ago

      Yeah, I personally would understand the decision more if they at least tried having mods. They donā€™t. Their mods are just the admins. The admins are also the only ones able to make communities (magazines for kbin viewers) on beehaw.

    • sim_@beehaw.org
      1Ā·
      2 years ago

      The admins at Beehaw have been explicit that this choice is not about locking their users in but about keeping bad actors out. But all of this is new, so the tools to accomplish that are crude for now.

  • Syo@kbin.social
    3Ā·
    2 years ago

    I guess. That is the whole point right? If you like how a instance is run, you join them. And if any beehaw users donā€™t like this direction itā€™s taking, they can always make another account on Lemmy.

    Fediverse allows for great potential of redundant, diverse, and flexible meta content consumption, but we the users are bearing some of that growing pain right now as this all grows and things get shuffled on the fly.

  • spaduf@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    2Ā·
    2 years ago

    Ultimately this is because beehaw allowed themselves to become one of the largest instances on the threadiverse with a minimal mod team. Any blame on the other instances/mod tools is deflection. This is poor management at itā€™s core and is bad for the larger community. That said I would love to see more in the way of improved mod tools.

    • BreadDog@kbin.socialOP
      0Ā·
      2 years ago

      Certainly so. From a sort ofā€¦ sociological point Iā€™m wondering what the impacts are of major instances growing independent of each other. I feel like I can already feel it with kbin and lemmy both growing separately during the blackout. Iā€™m wondering if the trend for major instances is going to be where each one has their own unique culture or if they will eventually homogenize.

      Only real concern here, although I didnā€™t participate during the mastodon surge last year, I heard that defederation became a bit of an issue with how common there. Granted, I feel like the impact is probably less here with the fact that you are interacting with topics rather than people.

        • AbelianGrape@beehaw.org
          1Ā·
          2 years ago

          Lemmy specifically hasnā€™t implemented less harsh measures yet. This is a stop-gap action to cut off a trolling problem at its source. The beehaw admins say they will reevaluate when less drastic tools are available, e.g. allow beehaw users to interact with lemmy.world but not the other way around.

          Iā€™m not sure I 100% agree, personally, but beehawā€™s ethos is ā€œbe(e) niceā€ and if trolls are trolling, it can make it very hard for some people to open up and contribute. So I see where itā€™s coming from.

      • Shortcake@kbin.social
        1Ā·
        2 years ago

        i think it really depends on the admin. I saw many threads on mastodon of hundreds of instances defederated with and listed reasons. some made sense, others did not.

      • Nepenthe@kbin.social
        0Ā·
        2 years ago

        Iā€™m personally hoping for a unique culture, especially since we currently have quite a good one. Going solo is just going solo ā€“ itā€™s sad and kinda dumb, since it defeats the entire point of the fediverse, but if theyā€™re ok hanging out on a closed forum itā€™s not like those havenā€™t existed for decades.

        I hadnā€™t thought something like Mastodon would be able to defederate. Thinking about it, that would be far more disastrous for a platform aimed at following individuals to be able to do. The stress induced from having to choose an instance knowing they block other instances and being unable to even tell if thatā€™s a bad thing or not until you investigate each and every one anyway. Having to look up what your favorite people are on, if youā€™re on Mastodon, so you can get news without leaving any of them out. What a mess.

        • eta_aquarid@kbin.social
          1Ā·
          2 years ago

          they defederated from Lemmy.world and the other one, thatā€™s it

          theyā€™re not closing themselves off; they made it very clear what they were doing and why; people keep just catastrophizing about it over and over for some reason

          like they made it clear what they were doing and that it wouldnā€™t necessarily be permanent

        • GuyDudeman@beehaw.org
          1Ā·
          2 years ago

          Theyā€™re not going solo though. They are still connected to hundreds of other instances. Including Lemmy.ml, which is still the biggest instance.

          • cnnrduncan@beehaw.org
            1Ā·
            2 years ago

            Additionally, the Beehaw admins have said theyā€™re open to refederating with lemmy.world et al if/when Lemmy gets better moderation tools.

    • zalack@kbin.social
      4Ā·
      2 years ago

      Or theyā€™ll just be a smallish instance building the kind of community they want to build. Thereā€™s nothing wrong with knowing what you want to be and not trying to be more.

    • BreadDog@kbin.socialOP
      3Ā·
      2 years ago

      Ostensibly they donā€™t wish to scale at the expense of the quality of their community.

    • Kierunkowy74@kbin.social
      2Ā·
      2 years ago

      They canā€™t scale. They will survive, though. Other generic Lemmy servers are overshadowing Beehaw as a generic Lemmy server. And it is fine for both them and Beehaw, IMO.

  • FantasticFox@lemmy.world
    1Ā·
    2 years ago

    I created my first account there but left for lemmy.world once I realised users couldnā€™t create communities and all the communities were controlled by the same small group of admins.

    I had enough of such cabals on Reddit.

    No mods, No masters

    • PabloDiscobar@kbin.social
      1Ā·
      2 years ago

      They did this?

      Ok, thatā€™s the definition of a powertrip. And exactly what we want to avoid.

      We sse it on some communities here btw, some mods owning 60 empty subs. I hope there is a reseting of subs ownership after a month of zero content and activity.

  • Sean Tilley@lemmy.ml
    1Ā·
    2 years ago

    Honestly, this is disappointing, but not particularly surprising. Itā€™s a problem thatā€™s at least as old as Usenet, in terms of different communities not getting along. Itā€™s also not uncommon that people setting up instances are new, inexperienced with moderation, and sometimes even just let people register without any kind of verification because why not?

    I think an important point is for admins / mods from various instances to try to get on the same page, in terms of policies. Building that common ground early, and establishing best practices, really helps mitigate a lot of the BS that can happen.

  • Retronautickz@beehaw.org
    1Ā·
    2 years ago

    I donā€™t get the issue here.

    This is common in de-centralized social media.

    Federation allows the admins of a server to decide what kind of servers they want to federate with, but also to defederate from others.

    Itā€™s only two servers that were creating problems with all the trolling and intolerant comments that came from there. Beehaw didnā€™t isolate itself/blocked everyone else in the fediverse.

  • abclop99@beehaw.orgEnglish
    1Ā·
    2 years ago

    I think one of the problems is communities all being created on the same few big instances that allow anyone to create one.