Then: Google fired Blake Lemoine for saying AIs are sentient

Now: Geoffrey Hinton, the #1 most cited AI scientist, quits Google & says AIs are sentient

That makes 2 of the 3 most cited scientists:

  • Ilya Sutskever (#3) said they may be (Andrej Karpathy agreed)
  • Yoshua Bengio (#2) has not opined on this to my knowledge? Anyone know?

Also, ALL 3 of the most cited AI scientists are very concerned about AI extinction risk.

ALL 3 switched from working on AI capabilities to AI safety.

Anyone who still dismisses this as “silly sci-fi” is insulting the most eminent scientists of this field.

Anyway, brace yourselves… the Overton Window on AI sentience/consciousness/self-awareness is about to blow open>

    • Ashtefere@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      As someone who learned about Ai in uni and now works in Ai, this shit is straight up bullshit and its infuriating.

      The most obvious thing about this being all bullshit is that the LLM’s don’t have their own idle emergent “thought” - they are purely reactive, so not sentient. Case closed for fucks sake.

      • BigMuffin69@awful.systemsOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago
        • Barges in
        • Insists that somewhere between randomly initializing the model weights and finishing training, sentience magically emerges
        • Refuses to elaborate
        • Leaves Google

      • Amoeba_Girl@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Honestly, I reckon a field of wheat would be more sentient than a chatbot. It can sense its environment and it doesn’t even need a prompt to do its thing.

  • carlitoscohones@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Every scientist I know is always going on and on about how the Overton Window is about to shift on their field of study. This is how serious work gets done, by measuring public opinion.

    • elmtonic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Must be a vestigial idea from the crypto hype days. Back then, if the Overton window shifted in your favor, it meant you were about to make a lot of money. With AI the benefits are less clear, but damn it if they’re not trying to find them.

      Actually tbh this is exactly the kind of person that might go all-in on Nvidia stock so it still might be the money thing.

  • sc_griffith@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    “quits google saying ai is sentient” has big “quitting the new york times and saying you’re cancelled” vibes

  • titotal@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I feel really bad for the person behind the “notkilleveryonism” account. They’ve been completely taken in by AI doomerism and are clearly terrified by it. They’ll either be terrified for their entire life even as the predicted doom fails to appear, or realise at some point that they wasted an entire portion of their life and their entire system of belief is a lie.

    False doomerism is really harming people, and that sucks.