• rubicon@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 months ago

      They signed him a blank cheque. I bet he was doing everything he could to get stung.

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Dude should have asked for at least 10k/sting could have walked out with a cool $270,000 instead

        • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          True.

          I will say it’s not worse than a tattoo and I’ve paid money to sit there for 6 hours being tattoo’d.

          Not saying I’m tough, as I’m pretty soft, more that often it’s the thought that is worse than the thing.

    • Floey@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      4 months ago

      The words of either someone immensely privileged or deathly allergic to bees.

        • yeather@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yeah, if 27k won’t significantly change your situation you are privileged.

          • morphballganon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            4 months ago

            We’re not talking about 27k for one day of work. We’re talking about an acting gig with months of training, rehearsals, costume fittings, make-up, traveling, shooting, reshoots. It’s a full-time job.

            I already have a job. I’d prefer to keep doing what I’m doing rather than that gig.

            • yeather@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              The 27k this article references is for the bee stings the actor endured. Which more than likely happened over a few takes spread over a day. At an 8 hour work day, he made $3375 an hour that day.

            • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              Bro you wouldn’t have to act in Hollywood, you would simply need to get stung by a bee or multiple bees until the total number of stings is 27. Pretty easy money unless you’re allergic.

              I’d do this for 10% of that price without hesitation. I’ve been stung my many bees in my life and never got paid for any.

      • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’m neither of those things, but I think I’m partially allergic to them. Last time I got stung by a bee in my foot, it swelled up so bad I couldn’t get a shoe on, and it was intensely painful. I have a high pain threshold, and it fucking hurt, bad. What’s weird is that I don’t have the same reaction to yellow jacket stings. Possibly because they inject less venom, but idk.

  • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Seems like they coulda used drones (not those drones, these drones) and no one would ever have known - and he wouldn’t have been stung.

    • sramder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      4 months ago

      IDK it kinda sounds like they just fired the animal handler and gave him their $27K.

      Maybe it was over a few takes or something…

    • Feydaikin@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Without knowing anything about it, I’d wager that it’s generally not a good idea to mess around too much with a hive.

      And picking out a bunch of drones in the amount used in film would no doubt rile up the swarm.

      The way they do it is likely the best, safest and least invasive way of using live bees in a film setting.

      • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        4 months ago

        You could be right, but they literally shove the drones out to die when winter comes so I don’t think they value them all that highly compared to the workers which are the stinging ones.

    • thejoker954@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      Most of the time I only vaguely recognize all but the biggest stars from my childhood, but god damn did that movie cement Tony Todd in my brain.

  • Bloodyhog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    Got stung by about 20 bees once (amateur beekeeping incident, taught us to wear proper clothing). Had a fever for a couple days after and did not enjoy it a single bit. $20k though…

  • FiveMacs@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    27
    ·
    4 months ago

    $27 isn’t really a lot considering each bee was supposed to be $1000

    • BlackLaZoR@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      64
      ·
      4 months ago

      American notation - they use comma every three orders of magnitude, and dot for decimal separator. It’s almost as retarded as imperial measurement system, but what can you do.

      • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Dafuq? It makes way more sense than using a dot for the separator and a comma for the decimals. Commas are literally for separating related ideas in a single sentence. The thousands position is related to/part of the hundreds place in a single number. What’s your crazy logic for using a terminator within a single number representation?

        • RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          Commas are literally for separating related ideas in a single sentence.

          While I personally think it’s arbitrary which characters to use as separators I can’t follow that logic.

          Thinking of sentences, a comma separates stuff that belongs together while a dot is literally a full stop. All of the comma/dot separated parts belong to the same number though. So, why are thousands/millions more closely related than integers/digits?

          • warm@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 months ago

            You said it yourself, “a comma separates stuff that belongs together”. The integers. I can type 27000 and its valid, I can space them integers with a comma 27,000 they belong together. Decimals are different to integers, so they are marked with a period, like the end of a sentence (of integers).

            You can argue either way honestly, but more of the world use periods for decimal notation. So it would make more sense if we just adopted that (never going to happen though).

            • RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              27,000 and 1.5

              Why do 27 and 000 belong closer together than 1 and 5? Both numbers are incomplete when leaving out a component.

              You can argue either way honestly

              Agreed, it’s completely arbitrary.

              more of the world use periods for decimal notation

              It’s two pretty large groups but you’ve got India and China, so population wise it’s pretty clear. Let’s make a deal: we (Europe) switch to the dot as decimal separator if the US switches to metric.

        • BlackLaZoR@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          4 months ago

          It makes way more sense than using a dot for the separator and a comma for the decimals.

          How about using spaces?

      • zagaberoo@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’d love to hear what’s objectively ‘wrong’ with this one. They’re arbitrary symbols. If anything, isn’t the decimal more akin to a full stop, while a digit separator is more of a pause?

        • RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Having a full stop between thousands is just as stupid. It’s completely arbitrary. It’s only unfortunate that it’s yet another difference hindering communication (and numbers parsing, dammit)

        • BlackLaZoR@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          23
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yeah, it is objectively bad, because introduces confusion. These systems are supposed to remove ambiguities, not introduce them

          • zagaberoo@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            29
            ·
            4 months ago

            Introduces confusion how? Because it doesn’t agree with the arbitrary convention you happened to grow up with? Why is your preferred convention not equally objectively bad? I thought Americans were supposed to be the egotists.

          • warm@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            4 months ago

            If we are being pedantic, technically you should use a space to separate the thousands (e.g. $27 000), as this avoids the ambiguity.

            If we ignore that and only focus on comma (,) and period (.) decimal notations, then period for decimals would win out, as the larger majority of the world population use it. So $27,000.00 would be the correct way.

            But until the whole world agrees on one, we are stuck with multiple, so you can just rub your two brain cells together and realise that the 3 trailing zeroes probably mean it is in the thousands (along with the rest of the context).

            (no shade at the original comment, which was clearly tongue in cheek, idk why it is downvoted lol it was funny)

            • kungen@feddit.nu
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              technically you should use a space to separate the thousands (e.g. $27 000), as this avoids the ambiguity

              But who has time for &nbsp in their lives?

            • Zagorath@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              (e.g. $27 000)

              Ok so they’re winning $27, but I thought it was filmed in America, not Australia. Shouldn’t that be $27 911?

              /s, obviously.

              But more seriously, yeah a space is brilliant. But you shouldn’t use U+0020, the space you get when you press spacebar. It’s awkwardly wide for this purpose, and more importantly it can break the number over two lines if it happens to line up that way.

              The best alternative is U+202F, which is both narrower and non-breaking. Wikipedia claims that the official SI recommended character for thousands separation is U+2009, the thin but breaking space, but I read their source and did not see this supported. It seemed to just say space, without specifying which type of space. There is of course also U+00A0, the no-break normal-width space. Any of these would be better than U+0020.

              The problem is them being difficult to type, which is probably why most people tend towards the comma instead. It’s automatically non-breaking and doesn’t have the awkward wideness of U+0020.

              Incidentally, SI specifically allows for either the comma or the point to be used as the decimal separator. As long as the thousands separator is a space, this can introduce no ambiguity.

                • Zagorath@aussie.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Why not?

                  I didn’t have the specific Unicode codes memorised. Those I found on Wikipedia. But the knowledge that there exist spaces of different sizes and the non-breaking space just comes out of my general interest in computers across the board.

              • warm@kbin.earth
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                Yeah, but aint nobody got time for that. Just hit the spacebar.

            • BlackLaZoR@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              4 months ago

              If we are being pedantic, technically you should use a space to separate the thousands

              Exactly. Space doesn’t introduce confusion no matter what sign is used as decimal separator. It’s a such a simple, elegant solution, world would be a better place if people were acrually using it.

      • Blaze (he/him)@sopuli.xyzOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’m not even American, just used the same notation as in the article.

        Seems to still be confusing based on the comments, go figure.