More dataisdepressing than dataisbeautiful

  • Don_alForno@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    42 minutes ago

    The gap sounds plausible, but I highly doubt the overall positions relative to 0.

    E.g., the Federal Republic of Germany has had conservative chancellors for 51 years out of the 75 since it was founded. We did not have a constant left majority (I assume that is what they mean by liberal, since the actual sense of the term doesn’t make sense as an opposite to “conservative”).

  • acargitz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    It’s weird that the axes of where “centre” is remain stable over time. Can you imagine comparing “left vs right” between the 1890s and the 1920s? Like a bunch of stuff happened in between, history happened, and that tends to redefine left, right and centre.

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Sauce, for those interested - https://www.ft.com/content/29fd9b5c-2f35-41bf-9d4c-994db4e12998

    In the US, Gallup data shows that after decades where the sexes were each spread roughly equally across liberal and conservative world views, women aged 18 to 30 are now 30 percentage points more liberal than their male contemporaries. That gap took just six years to open up.

    So it might be worth taking it with a pinch of salt because I’m betting it’s using the very dumbed down “liberal vs conservative” 'murican political view. Maybe skew all results down 3-6 points.

    • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Also hard to believe the American average is +20 leaning lib. The country is represented by a fascist party and a centrist party, and anything more left than the centrist party is considered “far left”.

      • greedytacothief@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 hours ago

        The graph is about young people, not the entire population. Young people in America are historically more progressive than older people.

        Also why does liberal and conservative have to be on an absolute scale? The words liberal and conservative seem to me at least be about pushing politics in one direction or another. Because policy is always subject to change, shouldn’t the words liberal and conservative be relative to the political system they exist within?

        • Peruvian_Skies@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Yes, “liberal” and “conservative” are relative, not absolute terms. There’s a concept known as the Overton Window which describes exactly this shift of what is considered the “center” and what is considered a radical left/right position in any given society at any given time.

          The idea that people should vote for their representatives, for example, was once considered an extremist take that could ruin civilization itself if implemented. The Overton Window shifted and nowadays even most Fascists will at least pretend in public to agree with it.

        • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          And, I did miss that important detail.

          It doesn’t have to be an absolute scale of course, but then why show 4 countries where all seem to deviate from the center? Are these country graphs even comparable?

          • greedytacothief@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Yeah I agree, it’s not a very good graph. I just get frustrated when people ridicule the US political system for everything. We have a lot to fix (like what’s causing women to become more liberal), but I think we need to focus on what’s actionable and reasonable to fix. We can’t become +20 more liberal overnight.

    • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Canada is so fucked. I understand the fatigue with Justin Trudeau and the Liberals but if PP wins it truly is cutting off your nose to spite your face.

      We deserve whatever comes from the next election. A person is smart. People are dumb.

      • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 hours ago

        There is no “fatigue” with Justin Trudeau.

        People are pissed off and struggling because of the decisions that their municipal or provincial government make, and then misattribute that pain to the federal government.

        Yet, they’ll vote conservative, not realizing this.

        Housing affordability, healthcare, education, traffic congestion, crime, homelessness, childcare, or even snow removal ARE NOT the responsibility of the federal government.

        Rather than buying “fuck Trudeau” stickers and flags to put on their oversized pickup trucks, maybe voters should learn how our government is structured.

      • Taniwha420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Canadian politics: red, Liberal party (center); blue, Conservative party (right); orange, New Democrat party (left); green, Green party (was kinda conservative, then had a meltdown around identity politics); BQ are kind of French separatists.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        The colors are also meaningless as well since there was no global definition of each color means respective to political leanings. So it’s basically a meaningless picture. At least the OP graphic (while it has some pretty big problems) tells you which is left and which is right.

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Interestingly it looks like in 3 of 4 charts men have, at worst, returned to mean. It’s the women getting more leftist. And I don’t blame them.

    • Aceticon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      20 minutes ago

      Liberalism isn’t the same as Left. It’s not even in the same political axis.

      You can’t really read “more liberal” as being the same as “more leftist”.

      Left would be something like: “I want the greatest good for the greatest number”.

      Liberalism would be something like: “I want people to have the most freedom to do whatever they want”.

      You might notice that these two things collide in things like the existence of the super-rich, were for a liberal that’s a good thing (they have maximum freedom) whilst for a Leftie it’s a bad thing (wealth concentration reduces the access to resources for the many hence it directly goes against the greatest good for the greatest number).

      Similarly centralizing control of part or the whole of the Economy (which decreases trade freedom) to achieve greater equality is absolutelly valid within the Leftwing principles and entirely against Liberal principles.

      it’s only in places like the US, were the entirety of Leftwing is about 4 congressmen, that Liberalism gets confused with Leftwing.

  • okamiueru@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    I believe that a significant factor for this can be attributed to mental development and maturity of boys lagging behind that of girls of the same age, during formative years. And, please read on, if you assume my argument is “boys dumb, conservatives dumb. Q.E.D.”

    The second factor is an education system where this offset in mental development/maturity is further confounded. Boys don’t typically do as well, because sitting idle and being a “good boy”, is more challenging. This leads to a path for boys to start working earlier, while girls get higher degrees. (I assume the trends for higher education by gender, to be similar, if not, then that can falsify this hypothesis).

    What a person then observes they get from society, vs what you pay in terms of taxes, is skewed between these two groups, and highly correlated with gender.

    If this hypothesis has any validity to to it, then one could argue that a way to mitigate this is by correcting the negative causes. Where the fundamental root cause might be improved by revisiting how education is failing boys in particular.

    The challenge with this is that if the conservative parties’ policies are driven by what can make more people vote conservative, then this will be a negative feedback loop. The worse you make it for a certain group of people that vote for you, the more that group is willing to vote for you.

    • sweetpotato@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I think the issue is simpler, in that the traditionally dominant group statistically reacts negatively to the levelling of the field and their loss of control and power over the other group. This and the fact that it’s statistically harder to see the oppression and feel for it when you are not affected by it(and this goes for every form of oppression).

      • DancingBear@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Ok, then this would mean older women would be skewing further liberal, not younger women who don’t have any life experience to have seen anything change in these ways.

      • JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I’m pretty sure women don’t want to date people who have any sort of disposition that leans towards hating them or believing that women are lesser than men.

        Unfortunately, a lot of men learned that way of thinking early in life(from family and/or media) and it ruins any attempt at a relationship, then they blame women and run to the very people who set them up to fail for validation, or find new ones like that sex trafficker with the pizza boxes, or that canadian psychologist who sugar coats sexism online. Repeat ad nauseum.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          I have an old high school friend who is very much into the whole Andrew Tate thing. His parents were separated, I don’t know the details as to why, but I do know that his father was a lot more stable than his mother, and I do sometimes wonder if he had lived with his father, if he would have turned out better.

          He also thinks the earth is flat because… otherwise a ball would roll off a table. QED.

          So not exactly firing an all cylinders to begin with.

          • Spacehooks@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            That’s a interesting point. My mother was substantially more mentally stable when I was a child then when my siblings were born.

      • DancingBear@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        In the age of social media I imagine people are actually a lot more antisocial than we used to be…. And if young men and young women are all online more now and actually go out to interact in person less than we used to, this would make it a lot more difficult for young men to interact with the young women long enough to ask them out….

        • Spacehooks@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Online is heavily skewed in women’s favor unfortunately. I had a female coworker that had 100+ matches on bumble and kept complaining how hard it was too keep track of. She wasn’t even very pretty and she had an empty pot for head. Meanwhile male coworkers really struggle. No surprise This will make some males bitter and lash out. Even if they do find a partner Worst part is if the social skills are bad it is a bad relationship. I hope we are not seeing a universe 25 style collapse.

    • SanguinePar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      From a personal point of view, I agree, but playing devil’s advocate, really the chart should be flipped so that the left/rightness is shown that way and the dates are on the vertical axis.

      It’d also be good if the time periods matched, and if there was a source for the data.

  • Lad@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    12 hours ago

    When I think of all the women & girls in my life that I care about, I remember that I could never be a conservative. It would be a betrayal.

    Assuming this is accurate, I’m pleased to see men in the UK bucking the trend.

    • Wanderer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      33
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      This is out of date.

      People are losing faith rapidly in the left because they don’t seem to be for the everyday working class Briton like they used to be.

      There is a big shift going to Reform now largely because they want to reduce immigration. The left deny the situation and the right have claimed they will reduce it every year then increase.

      People are flooding to the “far right”* because they don’t seen the main parties address the main issue they want addressing and have been talking about for decades at this point, generations even.

      _* not actually far right. But the left love throwing that term around to anyone that has a different opinion to them. They just want lower immigration, which historically has been a left leaning ideology

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        Look I don’t know how to tell you this but just because you live in a bubble doesn’t mean everybody else does.

        That is not “a big shift in the UK towards reform”, don’t be daft. They only have 4 MPs only two of which ever bothered turning up, they are about as politically relevant as my underwear.

        Also Reform absolutely are far right they are basically Nazis, albeit brainless lazy incompetent ones. You need to go outside and interact with normal members of the human race rather than whoever it is you’re talking to on the “I’m not racist but…” Facebook group

        • Wanderer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Do you know something about the UK I don’t?

          Please tell me about how the Tories link into this graph?

          • fakeman_pretendname@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 hours ago

            The graph appears to show that from approximately 2010 (Libdem & Tory coalition) onwards for women, and a few years later (when we somehow got a full Tory government) for men, the younger people shown on the graph, said or thought something along the lines of “this Tory government is awful and we need to move in the opposite direction”.