• Fonzie!@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 dagen geleden

      I mean, if your monitor or TV is 1080p, why should you waste so much more storage to little-to-no visible improvement?

        • Fonzie!@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 dagen geleden

          For about € 1600 non-smart or € 900 smart in NL.

          Nah, 1080p is good enough, even moreso at a metre or 2 from the screen!

    • Venia Silente@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 dagen geleden

      Yeah, that’s, like, incredibly wasteful. 720p is fine. Where are the 540p ripcorders at?

    • RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      18 dagen geleden

      You’re not going to like this, but I have been encoding my own B-tier collection in 1080p at roughly BluRay quality with HDR & Uncompressed audio. A-Tier movies stay 4K Remux, but the B-squad gets the downgrade (but I’m not willing to give up HDR / Atmos)

      • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        18 dagen geleden

        Yeah, usually you don’t really notice a huge difference betwen FHD and 4K, especially with TV upscaling it anyway

      • CCMan1701A@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 dagen geleden

        I love that we can reencoding the 4k HDR to 1080 while we retain the HDR color information. Looks great to me while saving a ton of space.