• Dasnap@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is definitely a ‘bankruptcy’ level failure. Why would anyone ever use this service again?

      • Fyurion@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not only that, but also a wave of lawsuits will probably gurantee they go bankrupt.

      • joe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not a cybersecurity expert. Did they make a foolish decision that would warrant a lack of trust, or were they just unlucky?

        • HEISENBERG@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          28
          ·
          1 year ago

          They were moving the servers to another location and connected them all seemingly without any kind of firewall between them. Some servers were infected with malware which infected all the other ones, including the servers with the backups.

        • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          1 year ago

          In order for a ransomware attack to do this level of damage there are several layers of problems

          1. They were not properly prepared to prevent the ransomware attack
          2. They lacked either the experience or expertise to mitigate it and contain it once the attack started
          3. They don’t have an existing backup of any of the data lost
  • _wintermute@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 year ago

    Great backup strategy lmao “put them all in one place what could go wrong”

    Good example of cyber crime causing bankruptcy.

  • RonSijm@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    Suggestions for being able to recreate your own websites:

    YIKES… This shows the importance of keeping backups in a different cloud, or on-premise or something - and not trust one provider with your entire company / website

      • Nommer@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Seriously this. There’s so much backend now that websites we view are pretty much created on demand instead just static html, css, and JavaScript.

      • KelsonV@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        And even when you can, saving files one by one from Wayback is a lot slower than re-uploading your local copy to a new server