• psud@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    103
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 days ago

    Why censor 4-Chan bad language in a 4-chan community. We can handle reading “normalfag”

    • FreshLight@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      11 days ago

      It seems to be taken from a platform that scans for bad language in pictures and demonetises/restricts access to these posts.

    • Something Burger 🍔@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      11 days ago

      Americans are fragile snowflakes who cannot handle seeing bad words regardless of context and intention. Their freedom of speech is severely restricted as a result.

      • Soulg@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        I mean I do agree with the first part but that’s not what freedom of speech is in a legal sense

      • Soup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 days ago

        “Not using slurs is woke and that’s bad” shut the hell up, loser.

        • Something Burger 🍔@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 days ago

          This is not what I said. Using slurs is bad. Censoring slurs when quoting is also bad and useless. Only Americans are afraid of words in such a way.

          • Soup@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            10 days ago

            If people weren’t so bad about seeing shitty things and then repeating them anyway then I’d probably agree with you more. It’s also not a freedom of speech thing since hatespeech(which includes slurs) is not protected in most places and it’s weird of you to bring it up at all.

            • Something Burger 🍔@jlai.lu
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              10 days ago

              Quoting hate speech without censoring in order to denounce it is not a bad thing. Here’s an example of the biggest French newspaper having the literal n-word* in the title of an article. They are not being hateful, they are quoting a chant by black protesters who used this word both ironically and in reference to a famous black French poet, to protest racist remarks by a higher-up at LVMH. Absolutely no one was offended by this article, because the newspaper isn’t actually racist ; it’s a quote.

              * I’m saying “n-word” instead of the full word, as I don’t want m-words to ban me because they do not understand context.

              • uis@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 days ago

                That’s because French are more revolutionary than Americans. Protests and revolutions seems to be their annual holidays.

    • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      10 days ago

      Drag doesn’t want to handle it. Drag wants to read greentexts without seeing slurs. Drag can handle it, but doesn’t think drag should.