Republicans have traditionally been the party of “regulation doesn’t work, elect me and I can prove it to you”.

Maybe Musk is just taking the logical counter-part to this “regulation doesn’t work, put me in charge of a heavily regulated company and I can prove it to you”.

On what basis would it?

Surely the government is allowed to teach what courses are run in government run schools by government employees in general. I mean, someone has to, and who else would it be?

Or if you’re referring to the religion aspect of the first amendment… this seems religiously neutral?

The constitution doesn’t ban bad governance, just some particularly easy to enumerate forms of it.

Olive oil?

You wouldn’t live long, but compared to the other options you’re listing…

@candyman337 I’m glad to know I’m not totally insane in thinking that a heat pump is a good idea here :)

It doesn’t seem obvious to me that it should need to be slower, or that heat-pump needs to be synonymous with ventless. Venting hot moist air to the outside should still make sense…

This is just completely untrue. Musk founded SpaceX from nothing, there was no prior entity he acquired or invested in.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_SpaceX

There are lots of legitimate reasons to dislike Musk, there’s really no need to make up lies about him to justify having an extremely low opinion of him.

deleted by creator

The word “potentially” is doing a lot of work there.

In many cases of piracy, the result of not pirating the work would not have been more income for the rights holder, it would have been the person just not acquiring a copy of the work at all.

Yeah, I don’t know what Colorado’s laws are on this in general, but even if it’s technically legal it seems like a huge risk that someone is going to plausibly allege that given the specific facts denying them time off was race/religion/family status/… discrimination. It might be legal (don’t know), but it’s a stupid policy for a number of reasons.

@deegeese There is a rather large difference between “not pushing things on them unprompted” and “disallowing them from having things they’re asking for”. 1 year olds in particular aren’t asking for any specific kinds of toys.

There is also a rather large difference between advocating for changing something as a society, and doing something just to your own kids that will make them different from other kids.

deleted by creator

The entire paper is already sub-field (AI) in industry (software engineering) specific. No stats are perfect, but I think these ones are pretty damn good for something where peoples role are pretty poorly determined in the first place. Of course you’re welcome to try and find better ones.

The “pure tech” companies I’ve worked at have been roughly equivalent or better than these stats, but at that point I’m sampling from software engineers in general (not having worked at an AI specific company), and my sample is unlikely to be unbiased anyways.

Isn’t the fact that he’s repulsive sort of the whole complaint?

Eh, the gender imbalance is bad, but not 0/12 bad… here are some stats

@Yazer The immediate “puzzle” that inspired this complaint was “Conundrum Unsolved” from Pathfinder Wrath of The Righteous

I suppose they had the ship become disabled to explain why it didn’t help out, but the episode would have been better if that part was just cut out. The ship didn’t help out because they couldn’t see what was happening or something.

Or if you really want the ship to be disabled, the people on the planet find out what is happening, and come save it. Discovering the cause of the symptoms and the locals understanding of how to mitigate them saves the day. Perseverance, diplomacy, “science”, not luck.

It wouldn’t fix the bad guys sudden change of attitude, but it would be a step in the right direction.

Satellites go beyond the moon, but not starlink satellites (or any future competing large mesh network of satellites), they are in in low orbit to minimize latency. I haven’t double checked with math or anything but I don’t think they should be high enough to be in sight of much more of the moon than the earth is.

Both “on the earth” and “on the moon” provide about the viewing angle of the sky (a semi-sphere). Unless we’re tracking an object with multiple of these spaced around the earth to get 24/7 recordings the moon doesn’t seem worse…

Even then, with two of these you could put them opposite eachother just barely into the “dark side” (side facing away from earth) of the moon and get nearly 360 degree coverage. You’d have to not literally be on the boundary/leave an earth sized gap in the coverage, but it would be pretty damn close.

Same as on twitter.

On reddit only reddit knew who you voted for (so long as your preferences were set so that votes weren’t public).

If your accounts are on different instances (with different admins who aren’t sharing logs, it would be weird if they were) then I don’t think there is anything to correlate beyond analyzing the writing style.

AcitivtyPub doesn’t forward on metadata like “what IP address sent this”.

I don’t know…

Posts submitted by other users could also contain your personal identifying information, do they have to delete that somehow too? If not, what’s the difference? If so, how does any social media site comply with this law?

Maybe there’s some carve out where your own posts count and other people’s don’t, but it’s not obvious that that has to be the case…

Like I said, I have an imperfect understanding of the law.