Weird. I found one in seconds on Google and it’s about whether you can use the way, not the rules governing turn order while driving.

https://www.gov.uk/right-of-way-open-access-land/use-public-rights-of-way

Did you look it up before making that comment?

Looks like someone looked up their state definition and was annoyed at being wrong 😉

“Now Jimmy, make sure you wait for a full year of bombing and spend a few thousand dollars adjusting the timing of this satellite to get exactly comparable images so someone on the internet who vaguely heard about manipulative photo techniques, but is fine with ignoring the realities of actually taking the photos, can’t nitpick an image of very clear destruction.”

EDIT: And let’s just drive this home: https://www.bellingcat.com/news/2024/08/27/satellite-imagery-shows-vast-destruction-in-rafah/

The differences between 2023 November and 2024 April are due to lighting, and it’s plain to see the buildings are still there even with lighting differences.

Between 2024 April and August nearly everything left of the red line is gone. It’s not some trick of the light or sand - you can clearly see the other buildings right of the line.

You’ve tried to deflect by saying people are missing the point and you agreed there is destruction - but no one said that. They said that your two points, that the destruction was not as bad as the images suggest, and that the images are intentionally misleading are both false.

And they are both false.

Dictionaries list common usage - even if incorrect. Look up the definition of right of way for your state or other government and I’m certain it will be the thing on which you travel or the right to create and manage it, not your “rights” while traveling on it.

I couldn’t find a list of all definitions by state but the three states I checked all use that.

It would be weird if they didn’t, since that’s been the term since before automobiles existed: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_of_way

Misunderstanding “right of way” is half the problem.

Right of way is ability to make a road, or the road itself by extension. You can’t have the right of way - it’s usually the government’s - and you can’t give it away. This is why wording is consistently who must yield the right of way, and not who has the right of way.

If it’s a driver’s turn to act, they are obligated to act. It’s not their option or right to act.

deleted by creator

I fully support you in this endeavor.

Try shooting a high quality air rifle.

Laws are generally not stupid enough to allow magic wording loopholes.

If it’s obvious that the nurse saying they gave the boy a “brave boy” sticker means the boy got a vaccine, that’s the same thing as saying he got a vaccine.

Compare to hypothetical statements like

“I can’t say what procedure she got, but she’s going to need to keep buying tampons for the next 9 months”

“I can’t say what procedure they got, but they’ll definitely need to sit to pee from now on.”

“I can’t say what procedure he got, but keep strong magnets away from his chest.”

“fair” means pale-skinned and her name is Snow White…

Shouldn’t we be seeing a character on the red board being flipped down?

DnD and cosplay is kind of BS. Those are wholly wholesome, social, creative outlets.

Mini painting not in either list.

I disable it and see how awesome I still am.

Missed opportunity for wild west bank.

Someone’s never played Pistol Whip.

Do you like 40k lore?

No.

Coolsothisonetimetherewasanorkcaptain.

Obviously implied? So there’s nothing in my comment that directly contradicts that and will make you look really silly in a moment?

This will come as an absolute shock to you. You can vote for someone you criticize…

Which party was it that dogpiles on anyone that dares criticize their shitty candidates again?

The point of saying it before the election is that the expectations are set.