I’m asking you to make a point, and filling in the blank with an example which I’m glad was incorrect. So what is your point.
I’m asking you to make a point, and filling in the blank with an example which I’m glad was incorrect. So what is your point.
What is your point though, are you saying Trump and Harris are equivalent?
Harris was the most identical candidate to Sanders possible in terms of voting record. By some measures she was more left of him.
I would place the most blame on Regan for gutting social infrastructure surrounding mental health and safety
Hey this guy is one of the bots posting AI content, get him!
Well yes, but think of how much more expensive our lives would be if we couldn’t exploit child labor without having to see it.
I have some water in my bath tub but that doesn’t make it equivalent to an ocean.
When he was tweeting for his followers to amass and how it was going to get “wild” (from memory I think that’s what he said) on January 6th long in advance I was freaked out but everyone said that was not a big deal.
I still doubt anyone will see this as a big deal the second time :/
If it’s concrete evidence then that makes the size of the stones less impressive because they could just add water and make them on site.
Forget legal recourse (assuming this post is true at face value which is a huge assumption I know) but if a corporation is trying to get out of ending a human life in such an obviously unjust way, we as a society should be burning them to the ground.
But at the same time, who would throw away their life (being jailed) in order to do that, because citizens are definitely not protected in the same way, so this will just keep on happening. (Assuming this case is real, but there are other equally abhorrent examples of corporations being excused of consequences for ending human life for the sake of making money)
So many dancing Spidermans
Good point, but also it’s not that they will lose all of the user data they sell if people switch off Chrome, just the parts that chrome collects.
If they were blocking ublock users from accessing any google products then it would be purely a ‘we only care about ad revenue’
It would be very interesting to see the internal data they use to make these decisions, but also knowing tech these decisions were probably made by a series of mid level managers sufficiently sucking the air out of the room until a critical mass was hit to make this happen
Pretty sexist to put it on ‘my wife is too upset’, reeks of boomer garbage
About 10 years a go I missed two flights for work because the taxi I had scheduled in advance never showed, and when I called dispatch they said 'he found a better fair, he’s allowed to do that’s
When I explained this to my neighbor who drove cabs be was still angry with me for switching to Lyft, but also agreed with the dispatch. Cabs don’t want to change, which sucks because I wish there was more competition
I’m not sure if what this person said is correct, but I can corroborate that there is some distant distant nugget of truth behind ‘the guvments makin da frogs gay!!’ that is actually an argument for better environmental protections
At the same time, Alex Jones has made a lot of women turn gay I’m sure and there’s no one investigating that …
Removed by mod
Lol you’re just showing yourself to be more of a fool
The more nonsense that people like you say the closer it makes me to abstaining from tipping so I’m not contributing to such an ass backwards system people bend themselves over backwards to defend
It’s a terrible experience. You made a bunch of common mental gymnastics that are somehow supposed to justify why the patron deciding the salary of the restaurant’s employee is better than the restaurant being responsible for pay and quality of their employees, we’ve all heard it before and it’s nonsense.
But hey, if you are suggesting it we can agree to advocate for not tipping at all if patrons don’t think it is deserved.
Stop being so defensive and whingy, I’m asking him to make a statement resembling a point so I can engage.