I mean programming in methods of anti-perving the camera view have been common in games for decades now.
I mean programming in methods of anti-perving the camera view have been common in games for decades now.
you need to be the one enjoying the hobby somewhere else, if this is the case
they are implying you are the orange shirt guy
While David Brevik did move to GGG, he is not a dev there. He is an “advisor” and was originally hired to oversee their product exportation to China. Now GGG founded their company making games on the D2 engine, and were big fans of it, but I am pretty sure Brevik is the only D2 team member that went over, and he isn’t a dev there, at least not fully.
They either fail to realize that the avatar is to maintain anonymity, while giving people a personable figure to watch, or they are just one of those people who don’t like it due to personal preferences, and want to sound like they have a better reason than that.
Points out where working with me give no security guarantees, that they accept when agreeing to allow me to hack them, either in person, writing, or electronic communications, along with allowing the terms to change at any time, for any reason, without notice.
According to a lot of people? No.
If by stunt you mean, “discusses how the character has been set-up as the natural replacement with games media interviewer”… then sure, stunt.
Jigs up boys! Fly! Fly!
Coo, coo
I think you misinterpreted the intent of my comment. I was saying that everyone being some form of fag is a 4chanism, and wondered if the person replied to was familiar with 4chan, because the reason for the term is basically something you can’t have gone on 4chan and not seen.
Everyone on 4chan is some xfag
Honest question, are you familiar with 4chan at all?
This, also, just because he may have had good coverage to do the surgery, stuff like that can have lifelong consequences that can need routine, expensive, medical care, for years, if not the rest of your life. Even if they are getting care, their insurance, even “good” insurance, could have denied much better therapy, for the cheaper route, which will have a major negative impact.
It is too early to be making up our minds about this arrest, this guy, etc. However, just because your parents have money, doesn’t mean you can escape the evils of the private healthcare system.
Yes, and the people, like Fuentes, who support it, and want it to be worse, should experience the thing they desire for others.
I guess your comment’s POV, being framed coming from someone who didn’t like people trying to participate with them in their hobbies, lead me to perceive the position being from someone out in the social spaces of their hobbies, where something like that can happen, rather than something like at home, alone, doing their thing.
I guess my point is that the way the comment was worded seems to create the opposite setting of what you were trying say?