Reject tradition
Embrace scratch
Reject tradition
Embrace scratch
‘This’ meaning the systematic destruction of the palestinians.
The death toll rose from eight to nine on Tuesday night while the number of injured remained at 2,750, Lebanon’s health ministry said.
I’ll admit I misread earlier statements, and updated my previous comment to reflect that.
But quit the bullshit. There is nothing “surgical” about ~3k people getting injured. That’s collateral damage, and a fucking lot of it.
This didn’t start in 2023.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli_war_crimes
This has been going on since 1948.
Right, and nobody else will be motivated to attack Israelis after coming home to an obliterated home with their dead family inside.
You have some history learning to do.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli_war_crimes
The destruction of the Palestinians has been going on since 1948. And you expect then to have a stable form of government after 70 years of it?
How dare the Jewish people try to build a safe home for themselves after centuries of persecution and oppression.
Slaughtering civilians around you doesn’t build a safe home. It in fact makes your home more dangerous, because now people are motivated to attack you in return
Israel detonated a whole bunch of pagers in Lebanon. It’s cartoonishly evil, and injured* a shit load of civilians.
I’ve been slowly working on it for the last year or so. It’s gone a lot smoother than I thought it would.
As stated lower down in the thread, there are more options than just suburban sprawl and tight apartment buildings.
And apartment buildings aren’t the only high density options available. Half the issue is just the bans on subdivisions and requirements for minimum parking, lawn setbacks, etc.
There is a great deal of difference in density between these options:
I can understand not wanting to live in a multi story apartment building. But for those people, some percentage of them would still be ok with one of the first two images here. We don’t all have to go with the third one if we want something more independent.
But the conversation is implicitly about how we should be building going forward.
That, and even if she has sudo perms so to speak, that doesn’t necessarily make it impossible for her to be a manifestation or byproduct of the borg collective consciousness.
In the original position, one is asked to consider which principles they would select for the basic structure of society, but they must select as if they had no knowledge ahead of time what position they would end up having in that society. This choice is made from behind a “veil of ignorance”, which prevents them from knowing their ethnicity, social status, gender and, crucially in Rawls’s formulation, their or anyone else’s idea of how to lead a good life. Ideally, this would force participants to select principles impartially and rationally.
Potentially. However, I’m a very argumentative person, and I have a very hard time biting my tongue. So for me, it’s just not worth the risk to begin with.
Yeah. There is a time and place, you gotta choose your battles. That was very much not one of them.
(A very good piece of dystopia fiction)
When everything’s a logic block, nothing will be