I think it is more a lesson in him finding more profit in a kamala presidency

Be sure to @ me when you come back!

She sure says she is. So does the Biden administration, while it is supplying Israel with the weapons and protections it needs to commit the genocide.

Dick Cheney endorsed Kamala Harris I think

https://www.currentaffairs.org/news/an-endorsement-from-dick-cheney-is-nothing-to-be-proud-of

Sorta like comparing basement nazis to burning villages nazis though. They’re both vile it is a question of effectiveness.

Tell that to the 300,000 dead Palestinian civilians

Yeah, wish we could vote for those candidates.

Your racist grandpa vs an ivy leaguer who brags about having a small business owner in her life during the debate (she grew up with a nanny)

Also jesus both of them trying to outracist eachother. Kamala might be beat on the home front but she makes up for it on the world stage with the israel comments.

Kamala says ‘Trump is gonna pull us out of Nato’ and Trump says ‘Kamala will make the US Venezuela on steroids’. I dont know why each candidate is trying to convince me to vote for the other

It is more like saying the axis is known to invade nations because its member states invade nations. Okay, sure, Germany and Italy invaded the soviet union but Japan didn’t, you can’t say they’re not a defensive alliance /s

Unironically yes, NATO members have invaded a lot of places, often in coalition with other member states.

Yes, it is their fault the nazis viewed them as subhuman and exterminated them in a way they didn’t do with the conquered French. /s

Have you actually studied ww2? France fell in weeks. So yeah the Soviets did better.

Yes, I think our democratic processes could be better in many countries.

No, we do not have democracy. We have bourgeois democracy that cannot be reformed into democracy.

What is bourgeois democracy?: https://www.leftvoice.org/bourgeois-democracy-what-do-marxists-mean-by-that-term/

If you are skeptical of the inability to reform bourgeois democracy I would do some reading on Allende and Chile.

And you think the numerically inferior soviet troops -who did better than the larger more mechanized and better equipped French and British troops- while also fighting a larger better equipped force demonstrates…

The point of this exercise is for you to find the numbers and experience a moment of self reflection. What I think of the credibility of the numbers doesn’t matter.

You won’t though. One has to wonder why?

No, capitalism vs socialism is; who owns the means of production, the capitalist class or the working class?

Okay, then go find other sources for these numbers:

• Number of axis troops invading France

• Number of French and British commonwealth troops during the initial defense of France

• Number of axis troops invading the Soviet Union

• Number of Soviet troops during the initial defense of the Soviet Union

Do you think your bourgeois democracy is actually democratic? If you are for democracy you’d be a socialist.

Literally just look up the numbers on Wikipedia(or whatever other center-right source you consider credible) and stop embarrassing yourself.

Remind me how many French and British troops were bypassed and encircled during the invasion of France?

Remember that the combined forces in France were much larger and more mechanized than the soviet army during barbarossa, and were invaded by less troops

Yeah countries which the US has couped in my parent’s lifetimes are more democratic than Cuba, where residents sometimes complain that the government consults them too much and which regularly has referendums over measures refined up from local committees everywhere until they have a measure to vote on. (See: family code)