hexbear isn’t fascist

you can lie to cops but not feds

Israel props them up

they pay you because they get paid by advertisers. cut them out of the middle and go directly to the companies running ads on your vids.

youtube pays you even if the content isn’t worth getting paid for

if alphabet’s shareholders heard this, they would take them to court. it can’t be true. and if they’re willing to pay, someone else will be, too.

don’t count on it.

so? find someone to pay you.

if you can’t find someone willing to pay you to make content, maybe your content isn’t worth getting paid for.

oh shit. super bad guy. glad i never installed a fucking client. fuck everything about this.

i don’t trust it because it is very big on the design meaning to be “censorship resistant” and there are certain kinds of posts that people make that probably should be censored, and while i like that some tools exist to make pseudononymous, censorship-resistant communications possible (tor and i2p are good. freenet is fine imho), this one looks like a grift that has a neon sign saying “censorship resistant”… and i am sure that associating with those people will lead to encountering some of that material that probably should be censored.

you can make money off-platform from your content. you don’t need to be paid by youtube.

peertube exists. so does owncast

peertube uses webtorrents. it’s viable. it works. owncast is fully self-hosted. it works. all the people downvoting are repeating a talking point, and have never implemented these projects.

peertube uses webtorrents to share bandwidth among users: if you’re watching a video, you share the data to other users at the same time.

There’s a good reason Lemmy doesn’t have videos.

peertube exists. it’s activitypub. lemmy is the reddit-like interface to activitypub. but the fediverse definitely has video. it even has live streaming through OwnCast (though i think peertube has livestreaming scheduled to be implemented as well)

edit: hey i just found a movie station!

https://movies.ctbperth.net.au/

Increasing the money supply, all other things equal, decreases the value of the currency. It’s that simple.

how can we test this theory? and would you ever concede it has failed, or will all exceptions be thrown under “all other things weren’t equal”?

this theory has no genuine predictive value. it’s a tautology

most of the things i want to send around my network in archives are already compressed binary files, so i just tar everything.

since soybeans can be fed directly to animals, there is no need to make soy meal first. they are placed in an oil press, and the byproduct of pressing them for oil is soy meal. these are bare facts.

7%, is feeding of entire soybeans

right. which is what i said.