Lemmy.world has not defederated lemmy.ml
You should edit your post; you’re spreading disinformation.
Lemmy.world has not defederated lemmy.ml
You should edit your post; you’re spreading disinformation.
How depressing. Makes me wonder if that’s part of the reason I’m struggling to switch careers, because though I’m well qualified for my desired role - I don’t fit the stereotypical career history.
Thanks. China looks like it might have a big problem on its hands with that large volume of young men without partners.
Big yikes on that pyramid. Please could you share where you got it from?
It is in Liftoff.
Depends how we define ‘overcome’ really. I mean, if cooperation is evidence of overcoming it then the question doesn’t need to be asked.
If we’re talking about our biological instinct for tribalism, well that’s why we’re having the conversation isn’t it.
Yes. Reductive in a crude way, not clarifying. I don’t think the parent comment at all implied humans are inherently bad and the occasional good doesn’t matter.
Rather inversely, humans are tribalistic but achieve good in spite of tribalism.
That’s a bit of a reductive take on the parent comment.
Human nature to cooperate and share is not mutually exclusive with forming in-groups and out-groups.
Well the prototype wasn’t even legs, so maybe we should just come up with an entirely new model?
I vote hexapod.
I dunno, it delegitimised the usefulness of Twitter somewhat. Now you can’t be certain that the NASA account that announces an apocalyptic asteroid is real or not.
Try Liftoff ;)
Has polandball come across to the fediverse yet?
Do you know where I could look for the actual breakdown - I’m not sure what to search for - would it be in the budget documents?
Bear in mind that graph that I copied overlaps more due to it being relative to high-meat diets (hence no error bars on that group).
The supplementary data shows much less overlap of 95% confidence intervals.
This seems needlessly pedantic, presumably because of a similar argument as the other commenter - that veganism is a philosophy and not just a diet. However, as the other commenter highlighted, veganism begets a vegan diet.
You also don’t have to follow an entirely vegan philosophy to follow a strict vegan diet.
Not to mention “100% plant based” implies you don’t eat fungi!
The study is about diets and their consequent impact on GHG. Why does it matter that it’s not about philosophy?
the UK do this as well
They do?
Well shit, they do! Shame they don’t actually tell you about it actively - as you said, they probably don’t want most people to realise.
Classic Conservative tactic.
“Evil, stupid, greedy-” stuffs pockets “-jobless, welfare scroungers!” stuffs pockets “Pensioners, vote for me to bring down our welfare spending!”
Eh, cows are the biggest contributor but all ruminants are applicable as another poster highlighted.
Also the study does include fish eaters too, as a separate dietary category.
I think you took that a little too seriously.