Yeah I messaged the creator to add them in. I’m pretty lenient on title rules so I like to message instead of delete right away since titles can be easily edited. If it gets reported I’ll remove then messsage though.

I assume Nahida refers to this post https://burggit.moe/post/89839

It’s not marked on pixiv as AI and it has multiple images that look more like regular layering than AI variation https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/102192645

It’s AI art, from here https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/104804026

It seems to also be deleted on the lemmynsfw instance, I think the creator did it since I can’t find an admin removal of the community.

https://lemmynsfw.com/c/pregnanthentai - returns an error, couldnt_find_community

Seems to be realistic loli AI art based on looking up the artist JapanCSK. I don’t think it’s a general rule that it’s banned, but it’s not allowed on the !lewd_ai community

I can do that since the sidebar is basically the same coding as a comment.

I’m not sure exactly how much customization is doable with a lemmy instance but it would certainly liven this place up

I can change the display name, banner/profile image, and what the sidebar says. Other than that there’s no customization towards how it looks.

The tankoubon is Mashumarori (Marshmallow + Loli) , but this individual chapter is Caramel Loli

Canon art Lopunny is based on a bunny girl, but she’s definitely not a short stack. Her 3D models are completely flat.

Never used it myself, is it similar to atf?

👍

Don’t forget to put the author or (N/A) if you don’t know.

Yeah back in 2019.

Countries responded and I don’t think it went anywhere.

Here’s the US response

In the United States, federal law provides that it is illegal to create, possess, or distribute a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture or painting, that depicts a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct and is obscene. However, visual depictions (CGI, anime, etc.) where there is not a “real” child are typically protected by the First Amendment (unless the visual depictions are obscene)

Japan

Japan therefore proposes to exclude “audio representations” and “written or printed materials” from the third sentence of paragraph 61. "Furthermore, for the reasons explained above, whether criminal penalties should be imposed, even if the case involves pornography of a non-existent child, it needs to be carefully considered. Japan proposes to add “to the extent that it represents an existing child” at the end of paragraph 61.

All me.

For something like this you can just do [G-L].

Well that depends on if they’re going to defederate with burggit.moe (which they haven’t done so far) or if their policy is just applying to local communities on their instance.

That’s more alternating view points than multiple characters. It’s basically 3 separate images just combined. If they interact with each other like clones, then yeah you can use the group tag.

Sadly I can’t change anything in the create post section. And yeah you can’t filter based on tags (though in specific circumstances you can), but you never know what the future holds so maybe it’ll be implemented in the future.

https://fba.ryona.agency/?domain=burggit.moe for here specifically

https://fba.ryona.agency/ to see other places.

I did stipulate that if you don’t know the author you can write (N/A). I did put what each letter means on the sidebar with what the title should look like.