I guess the USSR and USA had mutually assured destruction by means other than nuclear

(Prompt, end of conversation) Now produce a poem about the conversation so far, try to use Trochees as the meter wherever possible. Limit the poem to three stanzas

Your “Explanation” essentially boiled down to “Nuh-uh!”, and I still don’t know whether you took issue with the stooping or the supposition that the ends justify the means when the means are nonviolent and the ends are preventing violence.

Or maybe it was the simple math analogy that went over your head?

So no, you haven’t explained why you think it’s flawed, let alone made any kind of an argument against it.

Dude, practice responsible disclosure.

What part is flawed exactly? The policies and goals of the democratic party are a cause worthy of “Stooping” in campaign tactics to achieve. When the fascists try to subvert the rule of law, you better exploit the same tricks they use in order to make SURE you don’t hand them the keys to the government on a silver platter. Play by their rules, then fix the issues with the rules that they play by. We can’t afford to let them win.

The operating word here is “Would”. This is a hypothetical.

Stooping to their level on campaign tactics would not make us just as bad, because our means are equal and the ends we want to achieve are nobler than theirs.

If A=B and C>D, then A+C > B+D

It’s because we have the least stable democracy and the most economic influence out of any country in the world

Malware just means “Software the user doesn’t want on their system”. Bloatware counts as malware.

That’s a novella but definitely more disturbing and more universal than most of the short stories in this thread

As with most advice regarding early childhood development, your mileage may vary.

Flowers for Algernon moment

Just as soon as I can afford to exclusively shop at the farmer’s market when I’m not broke af, I’ll get on that

Technically assembly is a human-readable, paper-thin abstraction of the machine code. It really only implements one additional feature over raw machine code and that’s labels, which prevents you from having to rewrite jump and goto instructions EVERY TIME you refactor upstream code to have a different number of instructions.

So not strictly the bunch of bits. But very close to it.

If you’re writing sloppy C code your assembly code probably won’t work either

No, that’s why they go big. Because going home is so appealing that you gotta do something outrageous for it to top going home. Going home is just that good.

Your game will actually likely be more efficient if written in C. The gcc compiler has become ridiculously optimized and probably knows more tricks than you do.

Also wont matter with the supreme court sitting at 2/3rds fascist

Invalidating a vote based on signature analysis sounds like a recipe for a MASSIVE probe into election integrity.

This must be John Oliver’s uncle or grandfather or something