if your axioms support multiplication you’ll get division out of them for free

this is true… except when it isn’t.

In mathematics, rings are algebraic structures that generalize fields: multiplication need not be commutative and multiplicative inverses need not exist

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ring_(mathematics)

semi-related: would it count as piracy, if you reconstruct the 3d model from the 2d promo-images?

fyi: it does happen in nature https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_nuclear_fission_reactor

.azw3

didn’t they switch to epub last year?

so… netflix with extra storage?

can you run gothic 3 on a consistent framerate now?

I want this on a coffee mug, or a t shirt maybe

multiple processes?!

This falsely assumes that economic actors necessarily have sound judgment about value

Does this matter in the context of this post? I.e. are GDPs “the sum of shit people pay for” or do they get adjusted for “sound judgment of value”?

I like that they bring up all these informations, just to conclude, that neo-liberalism would be the solution (instead of the problem).

are you saying, that I will get banned on lemmy.ml when I post this !anime@ani.social ?

reliably maintaining services

it’s funny that you use that as a selling point.

In my experience almost no outage happens because hardware failures. And most outages happen because bad configurations and/or expired certs, which in turn are a symptom of too much complexity.

evolution could happen in jumps. How often that happens is debatable.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punctuated_equilibrium

full-spectrum lighting

this doesn’t sound true.

iirc full spectrum means “every wavelength” (like sunlight) and not just “3 wavelengths that add up to white”.

You vote with your wallets. Each time you buy a phone without SD cart, you are submitting a ballot.

Seriously. phones are 99% identical anyways. It’s not so hard to filter for the 2-3 criteria you actually care about.

is this true?

oh nice. If this trend continues, they will be by 4 million tommorrow and 20 million next week and by summer every human on earth will have an account.

Fraud is still fraud, even if they call it something else.

The consumer was led to believe, they could access the media for a long time. The time was abruptly cut short. The consumer did not get what they were led to believe. It’s fraud.

It’s like every other (consumer-)fraud before: they can write in the fine print whatever they want.

I am not saying that this argument will definitely hold up in court. I just want to point out, that it’s not so clear-cut as you are presenting it.

It’s cute how they blame Rowan Atkinson, when we all know who’s fault this really is… https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bkrcxLgHn-w

I use UK-Layout, with some remappings for my precious umlauts

q+altgr ->ü
a+altgr -> ä
s+altgr -> ß
z+algr -> ö

bonus: in contrast to the peasentry I have an uppercase ẞ (altgr+shift+s)