Na szmerze od samego początku. Trochę się wymądrzam i czepiam publikacji, ale to z parszywej natury i dobrych intencji. Jeśli masz jakieś pytania to śmiało pytaj - zawsze służę pomocą.

  • 35 Posts
  • 114 Comments
Joined 5 years ago
cake
Cake day: May 7th, 2020

help-circle
  • Is that the yearly Europe will freeze without Russian gas event?

    Most of this pathetic fearmongering, based on the terror of a cold spell in the middle of winter is just fun geopolitical fiction. We can all imagine EU has no gas reserves suddenly, or ended last two winters with 80% capacity just for fun. In this world Ukraine that did not signal their plans for the last two years, apparently just did so to sabotage its backers, the goofy trolls they are. Jamal and Turkstream pipelines had just disappeared, as such installations do, to which this energy “expert” could surly attest. In the meantime LNG technology has been rightfully forgotten. And so if EU wanted to buy Russian gas it cant for the wretched Ukraine forbids it… Obviously issues like the fact Russia shut down Nordstream before it had it’s smoking incident should not concern us. There was not a single decade of gas blackmail of any of these soon frostpunk-turned states. Winter is a brand new concept in this part of Europe, and no one ever considered its strategic implications here, that is before the author of this thin-piece.

    But the detachment from reality trophy is won by the claim of marvelous straight up climate denial;

    Europe has seen consistently colder temperatures on average since 2016.

    Honestly it’s hard to even make fun of such utter bullshit. Where does that even come from?

    Global mean temperature between 2013 and 2023 was 1.19 to 1.22°C warmer than the pre-industrial level, which makes it the warmest decade on record. European land temperatures have increased even faster over the same period by 2.12 to 2.19°C, depending on the dataset used.

    EEA: Global and European temperatures, Published 26 Jun 2024

















  • Wining the war means destroying the fighting capacity of the AFU,

    Works great since it got from “they bombard Donbas” (propaganda bullshit btw) to “dron debris” blowing up anything from refineries, factories 1500km deep inside, buildings in Moscow and bunkers in Kurks.

    and ensuring that whatever is left of Ukraine remains a neutral state that can’t threaten Russia and that will never be part of NATO.

    Also, Ukraine never had nukes.

    Yeah, OFC, Russia and USA negotiated their handover for 6 years and paid for it just to larp.

    Most people left in Ukraine do not care

    How would you know that? Spoke to any in real life? I work with them by the hundreds in Poland, assist massive trade union in Ukraine. You’re delusional.

    These deranged fantasies of yours regarding some kind of guerrilla warfare are never going to happen.

    You don’t know the first thing about the history of the region, or Ukraine, dont you?

    only western source that shows any methodology

    The methodology is social media + public registries. How it matches the oft repeated Russian complaint of the dead being signed off as simply missing? At this point if you started reading “mil bloggers” directly it’d be an improvement for your level of propaganda detachment. If it were 100k lost Russian army would be pretty massive now taking in 30k/month according to it’s own statements, wouldn’t it? So why are most if not all observable bases on NATO borders half empty? We even see that in shop sales around Kaliningrad.

    you’ll see that casualties have dropped off significantly in the past year of the war

    Yeah, not like there’s a lag in announcements and very clearly there’s massive meat-wave attacks going on for the last half a year.

    How do you think that’s going to work out for Europe when the hardcore fascists in Ukraine decide that you lot betrayed them?

    Why would they if they are supplied by “European fascist states” and also “have all died already, it’s all forced conscription”. They are forced to fight, dead, and resentful if not supported at the same time? It really makes sense in your head?

    Same, the difference is that I’m not licking liberal boots the way you are.

    Yeah, also a very highly decorated ~~navy seal ~~ specnaz sniper… I’m more likely to believe you’re a dog with the level of detachment you’re displaying here.

    Now you get to reap what you all sowed and I have zero sympathy for you.

    You just said entire countries/Europe a comment ago, but I guess economic hardships or whatever that was meant to be are going to be extremely selective? You know that staff you spill out makes no sense even internally?

    NATO decided that it would ignore Russia’s security interest

    How does Russia consider the ones it gave to Ukraine?

    You’re all going to be at each other’s throats

    So much for pretending you’re from here. And yeah, check out any history of the states in the region.




  • You picked the one with the worst effect for Russia out of three, yes, but still won by Russia, so what was your point exactly?

    And have you ever seen any footage of actual fighting in Ukraine? It’s either armored units getting butchered in the open fields, or tree-lines being the only safe means of approach and defensible entrenched positions.

    Finland is exactly the type of terrain that enables modern military action. Unless you’re expecting NATO to use heavy cavalry, or (the earlier) battle of Kursk style mass tank formations, which is by now even less likely then cavalry. Pick your favorite highway of death between the Iraqi and the north of Kyiv one for a reality check my dear tank aficionado. Not to mention the absolutely spectacular position of Severomorsk - northern fleet command, relative to NATO borders nowadays. Or the fact that Russia is in reality so scared of NATO that there’s hardly any equipment or experienced troops left in that region currently as a cherry on top.


  • Out of pure interest what does “winning the war” mean for Russia?
    Ukraine clearly described what it considers as a win, and it’s clearly very unlikely to achieve it; reclaiming all of it’s internationally recognized borders, you know as guaranteed by Russia and US when Ukraine gave away their nukes.
    But Russia’s win was meant to be a parade through Kyiv on the 3rd day or so? Then that got corrected to finally capturing the oblasts they already proclaimed Russia two years ago? Now it might require also reclaiming the part of their actual country they lost, I guess? Your beloved land of social justice never really clearly defined what it’s territorial objectives are, but yeah, it’s not even a war, since they still land people in prison for calling it that so what’s to be won.
    Not to mention loosing/crippling half a million of their citizens to size the poorest but fossil fuel rich parts of Ukraine plus a bunch of cities they leveled to the ground, with an estimated 1 million casualties of on both sides “for peace”. Oh, and a side of land fertile in mines. Or creating as you describe “a failed fascist state”, to… secure their border? Additional 1,340km of hard to defend border with NATO in the north? Which one is the win part here?

    And mate, seriously, I was born in a collapsing “socialist republic”, and watched it being rampaged by neolibs with explosion of every possible pathology that causes.
    It’s pitiful you wish such hardships upon any people, particularly for someones imperialist gains. And laughable you think what you are describing is the worst possible option for central and eastern Europe. Most of the region has seen Russian occupation, it’s in the living memory of our societies, which is exactly why things will not go the way you expect. The worse the situation, the stronger the resistance will be. We’re Slavs, we bask in suffering and fighting against the odds, it’s the one thing we know.