Consider the Supreme Court right now though, after raking abortion rights across the coals–do you really trust the US Judicial Branch anymore? Even if you disagree with abortion, they have a duty to uphold and honor preceding judgements. Without upholding precedents, the court is undermining its very own authority in the eyes of future judges and the general public.
I would not doubt for a second that Justice Clarence Thomas (among others) would judge in-favor of Monroe County’s use of Covenant Eyes. Sure, someone might have to “donate” a yacht to Clarence, but that man would pass damn near any law if he were paid enough to do it.
Consider the Supreme Court right now though, after raking abortion rights across the coals–do you really trust the US Judicial Branch anymore? Even if you disagree with abortion, they have a duty to uphold and honor preceding judgements. Without upholding precedents, the court is undermining its very own authority in the eyes of future judges and the general public.
I would not doubt for a second that Justice Clarence Thomas (among others) would judge in-favor of Monroe County’s use of Covenant Eyes. Sure, someone might have to “donate” a yacht to Clarence, but that man would pass damn near any law if he were paid enough to do it.