Fwiw, I just put the contents of two packets of pasta on my own scale. The first was 1g under, the other 2g over.

I’m all for scrutinising companies, but I don’t think Big Pasta is trying to cheat us here.

Me: Mom, can we please have Huurcommissie?

Mom: No, we have Huurcommissie at home.

Huurcommissie at home: landlord fined for charging ‘too little’ in rent

Baserow and n8n both have form builders built-in, so if you’re using one of these tools already it might be worth checking out.

Yes, that’s an accurate description, and I agree. The DSA is new and therefore untested, so it will certainly be a long legal process.

The investigation is specifically about whether X spreads disinformation in a way that is punishable under the DSA, but the headline makes it look like it’s unclear whether X spreads disinformation at all. So I think it’s at least somewhat misleading.

Disinformation on X is pretty much a given, as has been reported many times, see for example X, formerly Twitter, amplifies disinformation amid the Israel-Hamas conflict as reported by CNBC.

This is a good approach in general, but I very much disagree in the case of X. Obvious misinformation is shown right on the front page, and not only since recent attacks on Israel. Elon Musk himself is regularly sharing false information, not to mention the army of blue checks.

As the saying goes: As a journalist, if one person says it’s raining and another says it’s dry, it’s NOT your job to quote them both. It’s your job to look out the window and see which is the truth.

So instead of rushing out this “EU said this, X said that” kind of article article, I would expect an organisation like the BBC to find out what’s going on.

Good. But when do we drop the “alleged” part in these headlines?

go through union instead of your supervisor or manager

So they’re threatening workers with a good time? Interesting strategy.

Perhaps, but in this case OP could have shared an article that objectively analyses the general trend, rather than a year-old article that exaggerates a single decision.

I think JMAP (the IMAP successor) is the best choice here. It was designed to be an open alternative to the proprietary APIs offered by Gmail and the like. It offers a JSON API that clients can talk to using HTTP. The JMAP website has some examples: https://jmap.io/crash-course.html

So it seems that a simple server that implements JMAP would be what the OP is looking for, perhaps https://github.com/stalwartlabs/mail-server (which also supports SMTP/IMAP for compatibility with other clients)?

Now that’s a „today I learned“ moment for me, improving my feed a lot. Thanks fellow Fedditor!

So far I simply used a bunch of expressions to filter out certain topics I am not interested in, but didn’t really have a good approach to filter by quality.