Good news, but it’s not “AI”. Please stop calling it that.
Good news, but it’s not “AI”. Please stop calling it that.
I don’t believe it, and I am afraid someone will try it and get salmonella.
Sounds like it would be really easy to put those people in jail for federal offense, yeah? Also if we can print unique, hard-to-duplicate cash, we could do the same for envelope accents, right?
Who the hell just throws mail away without knowing what it is first? And if it’s not clear from the outside, then without opening it first?
I don’t know anything about this stuff, but if there’s bad judgement because people didn’t want to have to come back, then something is seriously rotten about the system and it doesn’t work. What the hell.
Japanese media is stupid too, Pokémon especially. South Park even commented on that when it was new. So it was stupid against stupid.
I can already hear it in my head.
I don’t know, The Joker used to be written to be funny, and DC keeps trying to strip that away from him.
Yeah, because you’ll fall off the bottom into space
But he’s not a man, he’s a Chicken Boo!
Just like cable! \o/
I do like a lot of what you’re saying, but this over here made me raise an eyebrow:
In the end, whether someone is autistic or not (as currently defined by autism as a diagnosis) is subject to an arbitrary line where the judge says “this is/isn’t autistic enough”
So you’re saying that “whether someone is autistic or not is arbitrary, there is no finite criteria,” and “everybody’s a little autistic, some people are just more”?
Indeed! And sorry for your experience.
I am lower-left quadrant by far. I used to make myself the center of attention, I was cringey, and everyone knew who I was-- whether that made them love me or hate me.
Non-rhetorical questions, just to get you to think.
Remaining sort of neutral with my opinions, I still state that autism must be by definition a mental and/or neurological phenomenon, and that means it has symptoms or criteria of some kind. And if autism doesn’t, then it would not be finite, and that would mean everyone is autistic, and therefore it would be a useless label and “autism” wouldn’t exist.
If you believe that you are neurodivergent, but you don’t share a not-insignificant number of relevant traits with another neurodivergent person, then you wouldn’t share a label. It wouldn’t mean you’re not neurodivergent, it means you should find another label. And if you can’t find one that fits adequately, I encourage you to explore your own symptoms/criteria and create one.
I can respect that hot take.
Dumb, preachy meme made by myself.
Wait until they learn that the thumbs-up in some countries means what the middle finger does in the US…
I’ve been telling people for a while that I can hear it too. Nice to know I’m not the only one.