They’re expensive when you’re not already building a CDN for delivery of massive files all around the world. Economies of scale quickly matter there.
They’re expensive when you’re not already building a CDN for delivery of massive files all around the world. Economies of scale quickly matter there.
Don’t forget, they’re slander and disinformation machines too.
Being incoherent and insane are two different things, but you do you Katy the penguin of doom.
Surprised this is the only English language post about this today considering Lemmy’s political background. America killed more people than the terrorist attacks by pushing for this coup.
It’s ironic, except for when we’re talking about the Fr*nch. It’s self aware humor that you’re being ridiculous. The tone it’s supposed to convey in situations like thisis that you’re being hyperbolically obtuse.
No, but let’s say that same person came in with a report of vomiting blood, suggesting esophageal varacies which are common in alcoholics due to hepatic portal hypertension but their hematocrit is stable. The next course of action would be to perform an upper endoscopy to see if those varacies are treatable before they really pop and the person bleeds out. That procedure would require informed consent, since it’s not emergent even if it is a direct threat to their survival.
On the medical front it’s actually a big consideration for us. If we give someone benzos and then someone tries to get consent for a non-emergent endoscopy, for example, that consent may not be valid. The level of “intoxication” someone has before we don’t consider informed consent valid is pretty low.
Actually refers to all forms of legal consent. A contract can be void if the other party is too drunk (to the point of legal incapacity). You also can’t gain informed consent for medical procedures if the other party is too drunk.
Civil rules about preponderance of evidence and if it’s just a he said she said situation that you were obviously incapacitated usually means that you won’t successfully void a contact because you were drunk though
Depends on context. In this case it’s obvious it’s not a “true threat.” https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/amdt1-7-5-6/ALDE_00013807/
No, ctl shift T doesn’t work well on android.
Then on android Firefox you accidentally hit the back button and it closes the tab and you can’t go forward and you already navigatedc away from the originating page on the other tab forcing you to open your history and try to figure out where the hell it is.
I like shoplifting laws in the common law system because they’re, like all theft laws, based on intent. They need to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that you intended to take and deprive them of whatever they’re accusing you of stealing. If someone conceals something in an elaborate or strange way, you can nail them without them leaving the store. If they put it in their hoodie pocket or shopping bag and have a good excuse for doing so (this is all I had, I wanted to carry more), to “hold” it however, and “forgot” to scan it, you need to actually show that it’s a pattern of several times if you want any hope of actually prosecuting them. At least with this policy I guess the stores can ban you even if they can’t legally do anything against you. Don’t take this comment as encouraging the policy though, you can steal whatever you like from corporations as far as I’m concerned.
Yep. Women are allowed to be awkward at getting what they want too.
They are adept at what they need to achieve whatever goal they’re trying to achieve. Gen Z are much better at using proxies to get around content blockers than millennials are.
When you fight and communicate by typing in a game, you tend to get good at it.
deleted by creator
If he’s a rancher, this is a beef herd.
I don’t want a lap pillow. Give me a real pillow.
They sold that one for over $2 million.