Government when the elites use loopholes and do devious shit:
I sleep
Government when the peasants use loopholes:
Straight to jail
Government when the elites use loopholes and do devious shit:
I sleep
Government when the peasants use loopholes:
Straight to jail
Different kinds of alcohol is just different flavours of hand sanitiser.
cutest insect
I’ll bet that when someone touches it they’ll die an horrible death.
“Guys the circus is in town”
As a vampire I finally found a use for my expresso machine
First, they use the most questionable tech. Then they will blame it on tech in general.
Greedy politicians will unfortunately continue the onslaught of these laws, until their plans are fulfilled.
The children they said, the children - All just a big wrapper for destruction of society by big greed.
You don’t want to know what an astrophysicist does in their free time.
Their excuse, ‘for the safety of children’.
So he hates the noise the youth made, but is ok with people revving to the extremes.
“Why do you care if you have nothing to hide?”
Government: hides their plans
The children they deem to protect are trembling in fear right now.
Also torrents can be much faster & secure than direct downloads/mirrors.
I mean maturity is a social construct
To answer this, no they are not perfectly rational. However they are not dumb, anyone can be a rapist, it is a mental disorder which doesn’t correlate with their IQ.
The ‘tons of reasons’ statement would be interesting to read about, as usually a perpetrators focus is rape and escape. Not befriending the victim - i might suggest how inconsistent this sounds.
Unless the victim has other mental problems then this could occur. However, I was simply seeking an answer, not an explosive statement.
The question was why he didn’t do it sooner. Not when confronted.
If he knew he did something wrong, illegal, and immoral then why did he stay and wait until the victim wakes up.
Thanks for replying. I do see that there is some incompatibility with both our proof. However, I do realise that you’re talking about perpetrators which are close to the victim - and that may yield a different response to that of a random person/ newly met person.
Suffice to say, it does make sense that persons closest to the victim would be the perpetrator.
[Article answers second paragraph]
Thought that an exclaimer will work for some ignorant people but that’s how stuff works.
And I am also interested of why are you so deliberated of calling this ‘stupid shit’, and ‘awful take’? I know I have put it in words wrong and next time I’ll do it better, but I assure you fail to read and understand my comment first.
I’ll refrain from deleting this as I know there are people who understand what I wrote.
Agreed, op gotta get that Ohio grind