No, it’s being worked on but it’s not there yet.

Wikipedia is not itself a source. It’s a way to get a summary of a topic and to get the actual sources

Why are people using a site named after the place they purposefully left with just one letter changed?

Believable as in imitates the writing style, sure, but what’s the point if it’s factually incorrect?

From the article:

The company joins a growing number of media entities experimenting with the technology […] These trials have already led to a flood of error-laden, plagiarized, and poorly written content due to badly implemented — and, some would argue, inherently unsuited AI models — that still have a strong tendency to make up facts.

Hate on Kotaku all you want but they don’t make shit up as often as AI does