But F the poor I guess

  • git@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It isn’t always true tho it is true for developed countries with low birth rates. For many developing countries immigrants taking low level jobs is a negative because there isn’t enough high level jobs. And I am saying this as someone who is supportive of immigration

    • this@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      And the USA is in that group now. We have about 1.78 births per women in the us and that number is declining. You need a birth rate of over 2 per women in order to sustain a population without immigration. If a place does not sustain their population their economy cannot grow and if your birth rate is lower than 2 immigration is the only viable option to sustain it. Less people = less specialized jobs = less overall jobs = worse economy.

    • Rayston@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Any citations of this effect? (not calling you a liar, your argument passes the logical sniff test, just looking for actual data if you know of any)

    • fu@libranet.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      @git @drolex that seems to assume that individuals born in a particular geographic region should have better access to employment than those born somewhere else. Am I understanding you correctly?