• whatwhatwhatwhat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    We don’t block ChatGPT because our CEO is absolutely drinking the AI kool-aid. He believes that not using ChatGPT for everything is far riskier to the business than anything else in the world could be.

    However, we do block all of the “AI” note-taking / transcription apps. The only exception is the one in Microsoft Teams that comes with the Premium license.

    • CMDerCatnip@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      @whatwhatwhatwhat Our marketing team is absolutely chomping at the bit for it. I do think there’s some safe and reasonable application of text generation, but I’m wary they know “safe” or “reasonable”. I feel like Teams would be a better option than most considering how many compliance/regulation acronyms Microsoft has collected.

      I REALLY do wish they’d stop trying to install everything AI related in the Chrome Web Store though…

  • adhdplantdev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean what are the cons of allowing chat GPT in your network? It could be a very useful tool to a lot of people. What are the risks of leaving chat GPT on your network?

    • CMDerCatnip@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      @adhdplantdev The risk as I understand it is compromising confidentiality. Most AI apps, including ChatGPT, use your prompts in their training sets creating a risk for a random end-user pasting confidential information into a prompt. I might be able to argue that in certain compliance/regulation requirements it could be considered an accidental disclosure and require a notice be sent out.

  • th0th_Q@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s blocked for us, because it’s a confidentiality and licensing liability.

    Confidentiality because prompt data can be used for training / review outside the company.

    Licensing because if it generates code and we use that code, it’s hypothetically possible that code is actually part of a codebase subject to a restrictive / “toxic” license that could get the company sued if not handled properly.