Youtube let the other shoe drop in their end-stage enshittification this week. Last month, they required you to turn on Youtube History to view the feed of youtube videos recommendations. That seems reasonable, so I did it. But I delete my history every 1 week instead of every 3 months. So they don’t get much from my choices. It still did a pretty good job of showing me stuff I was interested in watching.

Then on Oct 1, they threw up a “You’re using an Ad Blocker” overlay on videos. I’d use my trusty Overlay Remover plugin to remove the annoying javascript graphic and watch what I wanted. I didn’t have to click the X to dismiss the obnoxious page.

Last week, they started placing a timer with the X so you had to wait 5 seconds for the X to appear so you could dismiss blocking graphic.

Today, there was a new graphic. It allowed you to view three videos before you had to turn off your Ad Blocker. I viewed a video 3 times just to see what happens.

Now all I see is this.

Google has out and out made it a violation of their ToS to have an ad blocker to view Youtube. Or you can pay them $$$.

I ban such sites from my systems by replacing their DNS name in my hosts file routed to 127.0.0.1 which means I can’t view the site. I have quite a few banned sites now.

  • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    We could if we lowered our standard. 480p is better than nothing.

    You have to start somewhere and build up. YouTube started with 360p back in the day.

    • asudox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      That was years ago when 360p was a acceptable resolution. It’s 2023, we have 8K TVs, 4K display phones. Literally noone would want to watch a 360p video these days.

      • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Instagram, Tik Tok etc. manage to get away with very low resolutions because they mainly target phone screens, which are like 3" across regardless of resolution, pitch size is tiny anyway.

        I’m just saying, if the goal is to host video content, we can. If the goal is to host video that looks pretty good luck with that. 😃

    • icepuncher69@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes but thats not really an option this time.

      Back then monitors where more primitive and mobile wasnt even a platform back then, not even mentioning broadband internet speeds compared to what we have today as standard.

      360 looks worse in modern day devices than in ancient cubic monitors.