Also, the backbone of federation gives additional possibilities to solve this.
As the technology matures, there’s no reason why gaming@lemmy.world and gaming@lemmy.ml and gaming@whatever.com can’t be combined into whatever we’re calling the equivalent of Views in SQL. Multilemmys?
Each individual community remains there in the background (across the whole fediverse) , but for reading they’re already curated into a combination by instance admins or users themselves.
This would also give UX continuity for users if any particular instance went offline or defederated.
Yea but the more I’m using Lemmy, the less I care about some universal community umbrella.
The word right there - community - means some specific identity and togetherness. Even if it’s something generic like technology, I can imagine the people involved in those comms feel connection to it, and wish to share that connection to the users too. At least that’s how I feel about starwarsmemes.
Putting everything into an anonymous basket means loss of that identity by default, unless the user actively seeks for it.
Which I think is the wrong approach. I keep saying that humans have evolved to exist in smallish groups, communities. Societies who keep existing in such way are happier than those who gave that up for industries, cities and whatnot.
And it’s not like having an identity means people and communities can’t cooperate, Fediverse clearly shows how we can.
It only requires a little effort from the people to familiarize themselves with some specifics instead of just blindly consuming the newsfeed.
A tiny bit of effort.
If we can’t give or expect even that, then what is the point of all of this?
Also, the backbone of federation gives additional possibilities to solve this.
As the technology matures, there’s no reason why gaming@lemmy.world and gaming@lemmy.ml and gaming@whatever.com can’t be combined into whatever we’re calling the equivalent of Views in SQL. Multilemmys?
Each individual community remains there in the background (across the whole fediverse) , but for reading they’re already curated into a combination by instance admins or users themselves.
This would also give UX continuity for users if any particular instance went offline or defederated.
Yea but the more I’m using Lemmy, the less I care about some universal community umbrella.
The word right there - community - means some specific identity and togetherness. Even if it’s something generic like technology, I can imagine the people involved in those comms feel connection to it, and wish to share that connection to the users too. At least that’s how I feel about starwarsmemes.
Putting everything into an anonymous basket means loss of that identity by default, unless the user actively seeks for it.
Which I think is the wrong approach. I keep saying that humans have evolved to exist in smallish groups, communities. Societies who keep existing in such way are happier than those who gave that up for industries, cities and whatnot.
And it’s not like having an identity means people and communities can’t cooperate, Fediverse clearly shows how we can.
It only requires a little effort from the people to familiarize themselves with some specifics instead of just blindly consuming the newsfeed.
A tiny bit of effort.
If we can’t give or expect even that, then what is the point of all of this?