There’s been a lot of speculation around what Threads will be and what it means for Mastodon. We’ve put together some of the most common questions and our responses based on what was launched today.

  • mycelium_underground@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    if you believe meta is going to act in the best interest of the fediverse, and not try to fuck it over, then please kindly remove your head from your ass.

    • StableStackOfBricks@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I believe they may try, but I think the approach Mastodon is taking isn’t necessarily a warm embrace. They seem to be handling this with skepticism and I have read that they have plans to Defederate if Meta tries to exploit Activity Pub in any way.

    • ch1cken@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      if you believe meta is going to act in the best interest of the fediverse, and not try to fuck it over, then please kindly remove your head from your ass.

      lol, i can say the same back to you, if you think that instances de-federating from meta, de-federating from instances who haven’t de-federated from meta, dividing up content and users from eachother, won’t cause the fediverse to self implode, then you need to open your eyes.

      All of this started due to people’s mindset of “eww facebook bad”, the creator of mastodon doesn’t think its an issue and is optimistic of the change, yet people still are refusing to change their mindset, i even saw someone bring up conspiracy that the mastodon founder got bribed by meta… which is absolutely ridiculous.

      If things continue as is, with mass de-federation, you are going to kill the fediverse without realising. If you dislike meta, thats understandable, just de-federate client side, but if an instance owner makes that choice for all users, that would be censorship, something the fediverse aims to avoid. We all shit on meta/twitter/other large corps for censoring content, but when instance owner’s do it, its fine? De-federating for ideological reasons like this goes against the principles of federation.

      • eh@nerdbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        that would be censorship, something the fediverse aims to avoid. We all shit on meta/twitter/other large corps for censoring content, but when instance owner’s do it, its fine? De-federating for ideological reasons like this goes against the principles of federation.

        The thing about the Fediverse is that you have the choice to pick an instance. We shit on “big tech” when they do something, because there isn’t anything else to do. I personally want to be on an instance that will defed the fuck out of threads (and anyone else who will bring over people who will delight themselves on harassing me and my friends) should they federate, and if you don’t want that you’re welcome to go to an instance that won’t, and we can still talk to each other.

        ps: As far as I’m aware, Fediverse never “aimed to avoid censorship” nor had any “principles on federation”. In fact, there are large parts of Mastodon (well, mostly Pleroma/Akkoma/Soapbox) filled to the brim with the worst kinda people you can imagine, yet they’re all defederated into their own little sandbox. Nobody can decide who can use and build upon ActivityPub but we sure as shit can decide to not federate with a company so shit at moderation that everyone opposing federation with them seems to be a minority in one way or another.

    • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Meta will act in Meta’s best interest. We don’t know yet whether that will be be beneficial or damaging to the Fediverse. It could be beneficial in terms of user numbers and general adoption. If they are arses then sure - defederate