harry_balzac@lemmy.world to Chevron 7@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 months agoMay I say that this my first post on this community?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square11fedilinkarrow-up1233arrow-down12file-text
arrow-up1231arrow-down1imageMay I say that this my first post on this community?lemmy.worldharry_balzac@lemmy.world to Chevron 7@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 months agomessage-square11fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareDr. Bluefall@toast.ooolinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·8 months agoWasn’t this commenting on specifically propelling kinetic projectiles with explosives?
minus-squareLandless2029@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-28 months agoEven if they made some kinda super condensed handheld railgun it would’ve also worked the same. The propellant doesn’t matter. The payload does. Idk why they didn’t think of kinetic force vs energy. Since they absorbed energy. Hell they could’ve done some kinda sound based shockwave.
Wasn’t this commenting on specifically propelling kinetic projectiles with explosives?
Even if they made some kinda super condensed handheld railgun it would’ve also worked the same.
The propellant doesn’t matter. The payload does. Idk why they didn’t think of kinetic force vs energy. Since they absorbed energy.
Hell they could’ve done some kinda sound based shockwave.