His “research” is propaganda, you just have to examine it a little and it falls apart. I am not saying he is always wrong, but his monlogues are almost always misleading at best. For example I could say “Dont go to old folks homes because nearly 25% of people die there!” That could be correct, but its misleading. You can see through it because its obvious, but he is more subtle.
Compared to Tucker Carlson? Hard disagree. His show actually does research, Tucker is a stochastic terrorist.
His “research” is propaganda, you just have to examine it a little and it falls apart. I am not saying he is always wrong, but his monlogues are almost always misleading at best. For example I could say “Dont go to old folks homes because nearly 25% of people die there!” That could be correct, but its misleading. You can see through it because its obvious, but he is more subtle.
I didn’t bother reading that just FYI
Stay ignorant if you want, its your right.