Reclipse@lemdro.id to World News@lemmy.world · 1 year agoJohnson & Johnson must pay $18.8m to cancer patient in baby powder lawsuitwww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square23fedilinkarrow-up1371arrow-down11cross-posted to: brainworms@lemm.ee
arrow-up1370arrow-down1external-linkJohnson & Johnson must pay $18.8m to cancer patient in baby powder lawsuitwww.theguardian.comReclipse@lemdro.id to World News@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square23fedilinkcross-posted to: brainworms@lemm.ee
minus-squarerynzcycle@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up25·1 year agoLet’s hope that all of these: a setback for the company as it seeks to settle thousands of similar cases come to similar results then.
minus-squareanlumo@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoIf they have 10,000 lawsuits that result in the same fine, it might actually have an impact on their bottom line.
minus-squaremarmo7ade@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoDid no one RTFA? The lawsuits have cost them 4.5 billion dollars. Hence the bankruptcy. I would consider that “an impact on their bottom line”. Isn’t this what we want? For them to be punished so much they go out of businesses?
Let’s hope that all of these:
come to similar results then.
If they have 10,000 lawsuits that result in the same fine, it might actually have an impact on their bottom line.
Did no one RTFA? The lawsuits have cost them 4.5 billion dollars. Hence the bankruptcy. I would consider that “an impact on their bottom line”. Isn’t this what we want? For them to be punished so much they go out of businesses?