• appel@whiskers.bim.boats
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    I feel like we probably just never interpreted the evidence that was out there in the correct way because of our biases. I don’t see why they would have gender segregation when everyone could just do whatever they wanted to/were good at. Seems like the simplest method to me too.

    • Damage@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It makes sense for men to be more exposed to danger, we can’t bear children

    • Fizz@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree I don’t think they would have had gender segregation I just think the ratio of hunters would skew towards more males because of interests and danger.