• Coryneform@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    yes because it’s not anything intelligent enough to be thoughtfully argued against. a 7 year old could see the holes in such an idea

    • WabiSabiPapi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I oppose one more system of authority than you do, in the interest of ideological consistency, intellectual honesty.

      are you taking the position of a literal child?

      • Coryneform@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        is revolution not putting the authority of the people over those in power, and bringing those people low? that’s “hierarchy”

        • WabiSabiPapi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          that depends if you draw distinction between the people and the state (which is merely an abstraction of capital)

          state capitalism, as defined by lenin, is not a classless society, and is indefensible as a liberatory philosophy.

          just as liberalism abolished the monarchy only to replace it with a dictatorship of private capital, authoritarian socialism replaced monarchy with a beaurocratic ruling class and unilateral control of the means of production.

          the neck cares not the color of the boot