Selection of quotes:

This is despite the fact that it has been well-established law for almost 60 years that U.S. people have a First Amendment right to receive foreign propaganda.

The law limits liability to intermediaries—entities that “provide services to distribute, maintain, or update” TikTok by means of a marketplace, or that provide internet hosting services to enable the app’s distribution, maintenance, or updating. The law also makes intermediaries responsible for its implementation.

The law explicitly denies to the Attorney General the authority to enforce it against an individual user of a foreign adversary controlled application, so users themselves cannot be held liable for continuing to use the application, if they can access it.

Enacting this legislation has undermined this long standing, democratic principle. It has also undermined the U.S. government’s moral authority to call out other nations for when they shut down internet access or ban social media apps and other online communications tools.

Our lawmakers should work to protect data privacy, but this was the wrong approach. They should prevent any company—regardless of where it is based—from collecting massive amounts of our detailed personal data, which is then made available to data brokers, U.S. government agencies, and even foreign adversaries.

Thoughts?

    • BigPotato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Okay? Yeah. By that logic other countries shouldn’t have US or FIVE EYES Country fucking around with EULAs that allow them to collect your data. Everyone should stop playing with mega corps being cozy with governments.

      You want Facebook, you’re getting Zuckerbot tunneling everything to the CIA and anyone with a dollar. Countries as a whole should have better digital protections for their citizens.