• QuazarOmega@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    lmaoo, I can’t believe someone actually did that and was serious about it.
    I’m already imagining commits piling up with comments like:

    • “add a newline”
    • “move function up”
    • “rename variable users to user_list
    • “Revert previous commit”
    • “no John, it’s user_list and that’s it, don’t you dare change it again”

    He wasn’t an exec for very long.

    Good riddance I guess

        • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          If you really want to nuke it from orbit: do it for every character.

          It is absolutely technically feasible to go further than that, but I think that’s the point of diminishing returns in terms of effort.

          • QuazarOmega@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Hah, I knew it would come to that

            but I think that’s the point of diminishing returns in terms of effort

            Not if you make another application to automatically split commits in that way… application which will need its own commits, it’s never-ending