I introduced kbin to someone today who asked what the fediverse was. I answered for them of course, but it made me realize that the concept is still technobabble for most people. The average joe probably doesn’t care or notice that server A is really talking to server B. Just have them find out on their own and if a mass migration does need to happen from A to B, just make a standard announcement.

TLDR; most people’s reactions to the word fediverse.

  • Hiker@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t agree. The term “Fediverse” must be mentioned at the very beginning of the introduction - the decentralized network must be understood as the basis of the whole. People have made the mistake for too long of selling Mastodon to people as the Fediverse - that’s just wrong.

    • aroom@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      and the fediverse is also about value of inclusivity. it goes beyond a technological ideal.

    • tinwhiskers@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I initially downvoted you because I disagree, but then changed my mind because it’s still a valid opinion. Personally, I agree with OP. People are being scared off by confusion in trying to understand what the fediverse is. While I agree it’s good to mention the fediverse and the distributed nature, it’s often coming across as the main thing and I think it’s counter-productive. People will come to understand it just fine if they can just be left to dive in without befuddling them. I think getting them on board is more important than it being in the fediverse.

      • sab@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I agree it’s not important to introduce and/or explain the Fediverse at length, but the concept probably cannot be ignored completely either.

        People migrating from Reddit are faced with the choice between Lemmy and kbin, and a bunch of different servers. Telling them that “which one you choose doesn’t matter that much, as they will all talk to each other anyway” is probably of some relevance.

        • Gull@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The differences among instances really do matter.

          If Stormfront opens an instance tomorrow, would you say it makes no difference because they will all talk to each other anyway? You shouldn’t. The example of Mastodon shows they won’t all talk to each other, often for very good reasons. Like “that instance is literally Stormfront.” You can expect that instance to have Nazi moderation policies, to normalize Nazism and to engage in Nazi brigading.

          Imagine an average Redditor lands on one of the main Lemmy instances, where everyone (on penalty of excommunication) holds that Stalin Did Nothing Wrong, that Ukrainian culture and language should be exterminated and submerged in the Russian Empire, and so on. If that Redditor doesn’t really understand that the instances are different in viewpoint and policy, they can reasonably conclude that the Fediverse is dominated by tankies. Meanwhile, despite their faults, Twitter and Reddit still exist and are not so clearly dominated by people who like to promote genocide. What does the average user think?

          • sab@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Absolutely - I’m coming from the assumption that they are given a list of reasonable instances (for example from the kbin front page or from recommendations).

            Among a curated list of servers, it’s probably best to join one without assigning too much importance to it, and rather change instance later should you be unhappy. But of course, some instances should not be considered, and some might prefer to join an instance with stricter/more lenient moderation right off the bat.