• LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    Haha I’m committed to the truth but not that committed. Anyone can edit an article to put in whatever blurb they want, but it won’t stick for long if most of the community agrees with it and it has decent citations (none of which are in the screenshot). Also the text isn’t written professionally, “love to cuddle” is not language that would normally appear in a scientific wiki article.

    • drathvedro@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      and it has decent citations

      Not a case anymore, unfortunately. There are leftist meme articles that only cite tweets and buzzfeed reposting said tweets, but if you try to do anything about it, your edits will be instantly reverted and your account will get banned.

      • FiskFisk33@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 months ago

        Without examples it’s hard to say anything at all beyond guesses really.

        But if the article is about a xitter meme, tweets are the original source, and therefore perfectly relevant citations.

        • drathvedro@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          The most obvious example I know of is this one. Not a thing, never was a thing, and the entire page is just folk from 196 and blahaj dunking on wikipedia. And check out the talk page where they try to pretend that the skeleton image is the best representation of said “phenomenon”, while simultaneously removing any messages doubting it’s existence.

          • FiskFisk33@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            I dunno, it doesn’t seem to overstate its case

            While not all films, television shows, photographs, and music videos that use this lighting intend to portray bisexuality, many queer artists have deliberately used this color palette

            It also uses sources such as Vice and the BBC

            I wouldn’t call it a high quality article, like at all, but I also wouldn’t call it factually incorrect.

            • drathvedro@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              many queer artists have deliberately used this color palette

              [Citation needed]

              There were definitely none that did before the wiki article was created.

              It also uses sources such as Vice and the BBC

              The article from BBC is fluff written by a rando and is based completely off twitter circlejerk. VICE is not a reliable source as anyone can register as an author and make articles there.