Please understand that I haven’t tried or installed Arch Linux yet. From what I understand by reading and watching related videos, Arch is often breaks and a lot of time is required to fix issues. But I have also read comments from arch users who claim that arch has only crashed or caused them problems only a couple of times in a year.

Wouldn’t a stable or non rolling release distro be a great choice for the Steam Deck?? Also, how frequently do the packages get updated on steam os?

  • Zozano@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    SteamOS is Arch-based. Arch as a distros is extremely bare-bones. The main difference between all base-distros is how they manage their packages.

    Sub-distros may opt to change how the package manager works; Manjaro delays updates until everything has been verified to be working and not likely to break anything. Yet, it is still Arch based.

    There’s nothing about a base-distro that makes it inherently unstable. Arch is extremely reliable, depending on what you need it for.

    • I_like_cats@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Manjaro delays updates until everything has been verified to be working and not likely to break anything Yeah that’s what Manjaro thinks they’re doing (or would like to do) in reality the packages depend on specific versions of eachother so things actually break more often than base arch IMO. Please look at the list here as to why you shouldn’t reccomend Manjaro to new Linux users. Their management is really bad and preventable issues happen a lot

      • Zozano@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Manjaro isn’t great, but for a new Linux user, who doesn’t tinker, it’s quite reliable. Manjaro avoided the Grub crash earlier this year which every other Arch-based distro failed to boot from.

        My recommendation is Endeavour, but having the Pamac Manjaro GUI makes things a lot less daunting for those trying Linux for the first time.

      • AngryDemonoid@lemmy.lylapol.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I learned this the hard way. Started with Manjaro because it was “easier”, and I had nothing but trouble. Switched to Arch, and it’s been smooth sailing.

  • Molecular0079@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    Probably because rolling distros get updates for new hardware sooner. The Steam Deck was using a brand new AMD APU at the time so it probably benefited from being on the latest kernel and mesa.

    Arch really isn’t that bad. I haven’t had too many breakages, and when it does break, they’re usually fixed super fast or they’re easy enough to workaround, whereas I often have to wait weeks or months for bug fixes in more stable distros. Now, would I hand it to my grandma? Not unless I am the one doing the updates for her, but it isn’t the ticking time-bomb that non-Arch users like to say it is.

  • dotfiles@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Valve devs said they like Arch because it allows them to update steam deck faster than other distros. Looks like they’re skilled enough to limit the downsides of an unstable distro in order to get the latest and greatest package versions.

    • papafoss@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Arch is actually really stable if you keep it updated. Where it gets ya is if you don’t update it for a couple months or longer.

      • cyberpunk007@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        This has been my exact experience in the 8 years I’ve been using it as my desktop OS. Boot into windows to play some game I can’t get working, beat it a month later, come back and I need to get my boxing gloves out to use my computer again

      • halfwaythere@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Please explain this to me. It is stable till it’s not? What happens during that time that makes arch no longer stable?

        • papafoss@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you go a long time without updating there are generally lots of updates. So when you update sometimes you can have dependency issues. Basic maintenance prevents this.

          Personally I never have this issue and generally don’t have any issues with Arch. Truly have no idea why people think it’s unstable. Maybe bad experiences with Manjaro which is Arch based. Now that distro has stability issues! Garuda and vanilla arch have been rock solid as far as my experience goes.

          • halfwaythere@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Have a project that I may have to go donw this route. Haven’t touched Arch in many years so I’d figure it be more “stable”. Didn’t know if there were inherent issues. Doesn’t sound like there is just basic maintenance. Thanks for explaining.

  • Diplomjodler@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    The Valve devs have complete control over every update that goes out. If they do something that breaks the system then their testing was inadequate. But even when that does happen, they can quickly push out a patch. Also, having just one hardware target to test for makes things a lot easier.

  • vividspecter@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    SteamOS is based on Arch but doesn’t follow the same release cadence, as well as using an immutable base OS and an A/B partition layout (much like Android) allowing for rollbacks. So the problems that an Arch user may run into are less likely with SteamOS, because it has some extra protections and testing that is done before it arrives on the user’s device (particularly with the stable channel).

    And gaming distributions often prefer a rolling release setup, because gaming benefits from very recent kernel and GPU related packages (that aren’t always fully compatible with older/stable distributions), particularly with AMD hardware.

  • arthurpizza@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    For the same reason Chromebooks use Gentoo Linux. It fit their workflow in development an immutable OS.

    There are a few hang ups an end user might encounter but with an immutable OS it’s been thoroughly tested before reaching the user.

    At the end of the day Linux is Linux and it doesn’t really matter what you build your system on. If properly tested, it’ll be rock solid.