• southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 months ago

    Isn’t that the same as other newer formats though?

    There’s always something new, and if the new thing is better, adding/switching to it is the better move.

    Or am I missing something about the other formats like webp?

    • reddig33@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      You have to offer something compelling for everyone. Just coming out with yet another new standard™ isn’t enough. As pointed out earlier, we already have:

      • jpeg
      • Png
      • Webp
      • HEIC

      What’s the point of adding another encoder/decoder to the table when PNG and JPEG are still “good enough”?

      • Pennomi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        PNG and JPEG aren’t good enough, to be honest. If you run a content heavy site, you can see something like a 30-70% decrease in bandwidth usage by using WebP.