Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful youā€™ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cutā€™nā€™paste it into its own post ā€” thereā€™s no quota for posting and the bar really isnā€™t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many ā€œesotericā€ right wing freaks, but thereā€™s no appropriate sneer-space for them. Iā€™m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged ā€œculture criticsā€ who write about everything but understand nothing. Iā€™m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. Theyā€™re inescapable at this point, yet I donā€™t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldnā€™t be surgeons because they didnā€™t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I canā€™t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

    • gerikson@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      Ā·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      ā€œInexplicable Cimmerian Vibesā€ is the name of my next band.

      Bonus points if this turns out to be the output of an LLM trained by phrenologists.

    • BigMuffin69@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      Ā·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      omg, next time my wife asks me how she looks, Iā€™m definitely dropping that ā€œlegible magyar admixtureā€

      Edit: Didnā€™t work. She started talking about how in the old country, the Hungarians chased her family out of the village for being religious minorities. I give this approach 0 bags of popcorn and a magen david.

      • Mike@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        Ā·
        4 months ago

        ā€œBabe, youā€™re looking Haplogroup I-M437 tonight. No. Not M-437. Damn, girl, youā€™re an M-438.ā€

        • o7___o7@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          Ā·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          When you really want to confuse your astronomy post-doc partner.

          EDIT: Iā€™ve been reliably informed that thatā€™s too many Messier objects.

    • YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      Ā·
      4 months ago

      Thatā€™s certainly one approach to commenting on someoneā€™s picture. Pretty sure itā€™s better to stick with the standard ā€œWow! šŸ˜šŸ˜šŸ˜ā€ but this certainly sticks out from the crowd?

        • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          Ā·
          4 months ago

          In particular she felt like Anna, whom sheā€™d been closest with, was being dishonest about what they hoped to achieve with this whole project. Sanje further alleged that Annaā€™s good standing largely stemmed from her incomprehensibility, because people donā€™t have a clue what this is actually all about. Possibly Anna doesnā€™t, either.

          most straightforward hegelian

        • blakestacey@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          Ā·
          4 months ago

          I got as far as ā€œDimes Square bohemiansā€ in the fourth sentence before realizing that everything in that article I recognized, I would regret.

        • Amoeba_Girl@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          Ā·
          4 months ago

          Haela Hunt-Hendrix, the singer from the black metal band Litvrgy, was one of the principal organizers of this ā€œsymposium.ā€ [ā€¦] Besides making music, she seems to be interested in esoteric religious themes, numerology, and Orthodox iconography. In any case, Hunt-Hendrix claimed that Anna was stealing her ideas and twisting them in a ā€œcryptofascistā€ manner.

          Oh no! How could she!

          • Amoeba_Girl@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            Ā·
            4 months ago

            Oh my god I only now notice the title is a reference to Tiqqunā€™s Preliminary Materials For a Theory of the Young-Girl, this is like a supercollision of dumbfuck cryptoreactionary nonsense Iā€™ve obsessed over.

        • V0ldek@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          Ā·
          4 months ago

          Hegelian e-girlsā€™ VIP ā€œsymposiumā€

          Excuse the rather formal philosophical latin but qvid in fvck?

          I tried looking through the post to find out what possibly they could have to do with Hegel and found

          Thankfully, Matthew shared the Googledoc the e-girls had sent him with their prepared remarks. My commentary over the next several paragraphs will only make sense if you read over them (theyā€™re mercifully short), so Iā€™d urge everyone to open up the hyperlink and give it a quick look.

          Okay, first of all, itā€™s like 5 pages, ā€œmercifully shortā€ lol, go take a hike. Second,

          Concrete philosophizing means applying insight to the alchemical transformation of everyday life.

          This is in the first paragraph. I feel like reading this would make me devolve into an entire day of incoherent screaming and I have enough respect for my coworkers and loved ones to not subject them to that

  • BigMuffin69@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    Ā·
    4 months ago

    The once and future king + olā€™ muskrat give their most sensible total nuclear annihilation takes. Fellas, are we cooked?

    • Mii@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      Ā·
      4 months ago

      This has to be hands down the absolute dumbest take Iā€™ve seen from Musk ever. Dude has the mental capacity of a boiled pear.

    • mountainriver@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      Ā·
      4 months ago

      They are both stupid men who repeat stuff they hear to make them look good. So the question is who are this time the ā€œvery smart peopleā€ that are telling numbnuts like these two that nuclear war is survivable - and by extension winnable? Because if that is the US defense establishment, then yeah we might be cooked.

    • Soyweiser@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      Ā·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Considering they were saying this while having trouble doing internet radio at scale, a problem basically solved 20 years ago, Iā€™m not sure we should listen to them.

      Related to Musk, Trump and all the other fools. PrimalPoly revealing just how shallow and culture war brainwormed thinker he is.

      Image Description.

      Musk: Happy to host Kamala on an š• Spaces too PrimalPoly: Suggested questions for Kamala:

      1. How do crypto blockchains work, & why are so many Americans skeptical of Central Bank Digital Currencies?

      2. How would you stop the US govā€™t from colluding with Big Tech social media companies to censor Americans?

      3. What is the main cause of inflation?

      4. What is a woman? Description ends, question I have for anybody with a screenreader, does this spoiler method work? And also does the screenreader properly work with the letter: X as used on twitter, namely š•.

      • V0ldek@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        Ā·
        4 months ago
        1. They donā€™t & yall are ā€œskepticalā€ of ID cards because itā€™s the Mark of the Beast, so go figure
        2. Easy, regulate Big Tech to the ground until thereā€™s only Small-to-Medium Tech left
        3. Air, most of the time.
        4. Your mom.

        Can I be a VP or at least Chief of Staff now

        • Soyweiser@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          Ā·
          4 months ago

          ā€œWell If you had read my paper on evolutionary psychology I did while looking at sex workers, accusations of weirdness is a actually sign of ā€¦ā€

      • flavia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        Ā·
        4 months ago

        Spoilers are an html element so they should work everywhere. Mastodon just shows the text without spoiler or CW. Letters in a different typeface specified by Unicode are announced the same as regular letters for this purpose, emphasis, to the dismay of mathematicians that would want ā€œdouble-stroke Xā€ to be announced.

      • BigMuffin69@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        Ā·
        4 months ago

        I cannot get over the fact that this man child who is so concerned with ā€œthe future of humanityā€ is both out right trying to buy the presidency and downplaying the very real weapons that can easily wipe out 70% of the Earthā€™s population in 2 hours. Remember yaā€™ll, the cost of microwaving the world is negligible compared to the power of spicy autocomplete.

    • imadabouzu@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      Ā·
      4 months ago

      Watching this election has been amazing! LIKE WOAH what a fucking obviously self destructive end to delusion. Can I be optimistic and hope that with EA leaning explicitly heavier into the hard right Trump position, when it collapses and Harris takes it, maybe some of them will self reflective on what the hell they think ā€œEffectiveā€ means anyways.

    • saucerwizard@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      Ā·
      4 months ago

      The Bismarck Analysis crew were sneering at Sagan being a filthy peace activist so I would hazard that the era of ā€˜survivable nuclear warā€™ rides again.

  • gerikson@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    Ā·
    4 months ago

    I found the most HN comment of all time:

    What sort of mating strategy are you optimizing for?

  • cornflake@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    Ā·
    4 months ago

    Post from July, tweet from today:

    Itā€™s easy to forget that Scottstar Codex just makes shit up, but what the fuck ā€œdynamicā€ is he talking about? Heā€™s describing this like a recurring pattern and not an addled fever dream

    Thereā€™s a dynamic in gun control debates, where the anti-gun side says ā€œYOU NEED TO BAN THE BAD ASSAULT GUNS, YOU KNOW, THE ONES THAT COMMIT ALL THE SCHOOL SHOOTINGSā€. Then Congress wants to look tough, so they ban some poorly-defined set of guns. Then the Supreme Court strikes it down, which Congress could easily have predicted but they were so fixated on looking tough that they didnā€™t bother double-checking it was constitutional. Then they pass some much weaker bill, and a hobbyist discovers that if you add such-and-such a 3D printed part to a legal gun, it becomes exactly like whatever category of guns they banned. Then someone commits another school shooting, and the anti-gun people come back with ā€œWHY DIDNā€™T YOU BAN THE BAD ASSAULT GUNS? I THOUGHT WE TOLD YOU TO BE TOUGH! WHY CANā€™T ANYONE EVER BE TOUGH ON GUNS?ā€

    Embarrassing to be this uninformed about such a high profile issue, no less that youā€™re choosing to write about derisively.

    • maol@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      Ā·
      4 months ago

      Surely this is 3 or 4 different anti-gun control tropes all smashed together.

  • gerikson@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    Ā·
    4 months ago

    This came up in a podcast I listen to:

    WaPo: "OpenAI illegally barred staff from airing safety risks, whistleblowers say "

    archive link https://archive.is/E3M2p

    OpenAI whistleblowers have filed a complaint with the Securities and Exchange Commission alleging the artificial intelligence company illegally prohibited its employees from warning regulators about the grave risks its technology may pose to humanity, calling for an investigation.

    While Iā€™m not prepared to defend OpenAI here I suspect this is just to shut up the most hysterical employees who still actually believe theyā€™re building the P(doom) machine.

    • scruiser@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      Ā·
      4 months ago

      I mean, if you play on the doom to hype yourself, dealing with employees that take that seriously feel like a deserved outcome.

    • imadabouzu@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      Ā·
      4 months ago

      Short story: itā€™s smoke and mirrors.

      Longer story: This is now how software releases work I guess. Alot is running on open aiā€™s anticipated release of GPT 5. They have to keep promising enormous leaps in capability because everyone else has caught up and thereā€™s no more training data. So the next trick is that for their next batch of models they have ā€œsolvedā€ various problems that people say you canā€™t solve with LLMs, and they are going to be massively better without needing more data.

      But, as someone with insider info, itā€™s all smoke and mirrors.

      The model that ā€œsolvedā€ structured data is emperically worse at other tasks as a result, and I imagine the solution basically just looks like polling multiple response until the parser validates on the other end (so basically itā€™s a price optimization afaik).

      The next large model launching with the new Q* change tomorrow is ā€œapproaching agi because it can now reliably count lettersā€ but actually itā€™s still just agents (Q* looks to be just a cost optimization of agents on the backend, thatā€™s basically it), because the only way it can count letters is that it invokes agents and tool use to write a python program and feed the text into that. Basically, it is all the things that already exist independently but wrapped up together. Interestingly, theyā€™re so confident in this model that they donā€™t run the resulting python themselves. Itā€™s still up to you or one of those LLM wrapper companies to execute the likely broken from time to time code to umā€¦ checks notes count the number of letters in a sentence.

      But, by rearranging what already exists and claiming it solved the fundamental issues, OpenAI can claim exponential progress, terrify investors into blowing more money into the ecosystem, and make true believers lose their mind.

      Expect more of this around GPT-5 which they promise ā€œIs so scary they canā€™t release it until after the electionsā€. My guess? Itā€™s nothing different, but they have to create a story so that true believers will see it as something different.

      • gerikson@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        Ā·
        4 months ago

        Yeah, Iā€™m not in any doubt that the C-level and marketing team are goosing the numbers like crazy to keep the buuble from bursting, but I also think theyā€™re the ones that are most cognizant of the fact that ChatGPT is definitely not the Doom Machine. But I also believe they have employees who they cannot fire because they would spread a hella lot doomspeak if they did, who are True Believers.

        • BlueMonday1984@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          Ā·
          4 months ago

          I also believe they have employees who they cannot fire because they would spread a hella lot doomspeak if they did, who are True Believers.

          Part of me suspects they probably also arenā€™t the sharpest knives in OpenAIā€™s drawer.

          • imadabouzu@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            Ā·
            4 months ago

            It can be both. Like, probably OpenAI is kind of hoping that this story becomes wide and is taken seriously, and has no problem suggesting implicitly and explicitly that their employeeā€™s stocks are tied to how scared everyone is.

            Remember when Altman almost got outed and people got pressured not to walk? That their options were at risk?

            Strange hysteria like this doesnā€™t need just one reason. It just needs an input dependency and ambiguity, the rest takes of itself.

      • ShakingMyHead@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        Ā·
        4 months ago

        Well, itā€™s now yesterdayā€™s tomorrow and while thereā€™s an update Iā€™m not seeing a Q* announcement.

        • imadabouzu@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          Ā·
          4 months ago

          Q*

          My understanding is that it was renamed or rebranded to Strawberry which itself nebulous marketting maybe itā€™s the new larger model or maybe itā€™s GPT-5 or maybeā€¦

          itā€™s all smoke and mirrors. I think my point is, they made some cost optimizations and mostly moved around things that existed, and theyā€™ll keep doing that.

          • froztbyte@awful.systemsOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            Ā·
            4 months ago

            OH

            I first saw this then later saw the ā€œopenai employees tweeted šŸ“ā€ and thought the latter was them being cheeky dipshits about the former. admittedly I didnā€™t look deeper (because ugh)

            but this is even more hilarious and dumb

    • V0ldek@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      Ā·
      4 months ago

      ā€˜TESCREALā€™ refers to a nonsense conspiracy theory that disparages people such as Nick Bostrom without citing any sources that are credible on the question of whether Nick Bostrom is an ā€˜evil eugenicistā€™ or whatever.

      WP:LOL. WP:LMAO even.

      • imadabouzu@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        Ā·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Iā€™m ok with this because everytime Nick Bostromā€™s name is used publicly to defend anything, and then I show people what Nick Bostrom believes and writes, I robustly get a, ā€œWhat the fuck is this shit? And these people are associated with him? Fuck that.ā€

    • Soyweiser@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      Ā·
      4 months ago

      I used to wonder if they had thought about deadlock/livelock re self driving cars. Thanks to modern technology I no longer have to wonder. Thanks!

    • YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      Ā·
      4 months ago

      Oh this sounds like a dog I used to have as a kid! They needed more enrichment during the day or else sheā€™d bark into the void all night and get super excited when another dog barked back.

      Have they tried taking the waymos out for walkies?

    • froztbyte@awful.systemsOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      Ā·
      4 months ago

      saw a video of this yesterday, that ā€œhonkā€ title extremely understates how fucking dumb the problem is

      in the video I saw, those dumb-ass things are literally crawling forward and back in the parking lot, because the one in front of it is also doing it, becauseā€¦

      yes, a multi-car movement deadlock, with a visually clear solution (which any human driver would be able to implement in seconds) that nonetheless still doesnā€™t happen becauseā€¦.? I guess waymo didnā€™t code in inter-car communication or something

      seriously, find a copy and watch. itā€™ll give a lovely kicker to your day :>

    • hrrrngh@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      Ā·
      4 months ago

      ā€œhelp artists with tasks such as animating a custom character or using the character as a model for clothing etcā€

      The ā€œdeepfakeā€ and ā€œ(uncensored)ā€ in the repo description have me questioning that ever so slightly

  • gerikson@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    Ā·
    4 months ago

    Who had Trump accusing the Harris campaign of using AI to inflate crowd size photos on their Election ā€˜24 bingo card? Anyway, Iā€™m sure that being associated with fraud and fakes is Good For AI.

    • froztbyte@awful.systemsOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      Ā·
      4 months ago

      jesus, thatā€™s telling. and I can 100% see that sentence forming in the heads of the types of people who fall over themselves to create something like these tools. so caught up in the math and the technical cool, they canā€™t appreciate other beauty

    • 200fifty@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      Ā·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Can AI companies legally ingest copyrighted materials found on the internet to train their models, and use them to pump out commercial products that they then profit from? Or, as the tech companies claim, does generative AI output constitute fair use?

      This is kind of the central issue to me honestly. Iā€™m not a lawyer, just a (non-professional) artist, but it seems to me like ā€œusing artistic works without permission of the original creators in order to create commercial content that directly competes with and destroys the market for the original workā€ is extremely not fair use. In fact itā€™s kind of a prototypically unfair use.

      Meanwhile Midjourney and OpenAI are over here like ā€œuhh, no copyright infringement intended!!!ā€ as though ā€œfair useā€ is a magic word you say that makes the thing youā€™re doing suddenly okay. They donā€™t seem to have very solid arguments justifying them other than ā€œAI learns like a person!ā€ (false) and ā€œwell google books did something thatā€™s not really the same at all that one timeā€.

      I dunno, I know that legally we donā€™t know which way this is going to go, because the ai people presumably have very good lawyers, but something about the way everyone seems to frame this as ā€œoh, both sides have good points! who will turn out to be right in the end!ā€ really bugs me for some reason. Like, it seems to me that thereā€™s a notable asymmetry here!

      • BlueMonday1984@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        Ā·
        4 months ago

        I dunno, I know that legally we donā€™t know which way this is going to go, because the ai people presumably have very good lawyers

        Youā€™re not wrong on the AI corps having good lawyers, but I suspect those lawyers donā€™t have much to work with:

        If I were a betting man, Iā€™d put my money on the trial being a bloodbath in the artistsā€™ favour, and the resulting legal precedent being one which will likely kill generative AI as we know it.

        • 200fifty@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          Ā·
          4 months ago

          God, that would be the dream, huh? Absolutely crossing my fingers it all shakes out this way.

          • imadabouzu@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            Ā·
            4 months ago

            Stranger things have happened. But in either case, we should commit to supporting every effort. If one punch doesnā€™t work take another. Death by a million cuts.

      • imadabouzu@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        Ā·
        4 months ago

        Like, it seems to me that thereā€™s a notable asymmetry here!

        I think thatā€™s a great framing here.

  • hrrrngh@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    Ā·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    https://www.reddit.com/r/CharacterAI/comments/1eqsoom/guys_we_have_to_do_somthing_about_this_fiӏtŠµr/

    This community pops up on /r/all every so often and each time it scares me.

    Sometimes I see kids games (and all games really) have ultra-niche, super-online protests that are like ā€œSTOP Zooshacorp from DESTROYING K-Smog vs. Batboy Onlineā€, and when I look closer itā€™s either even more confusing or itā€™s about something people didnā€™t like in the latest update. This is like that, but with an awful twist where itā€™s about people getting really attached to these AI girlfriend/sex roleplay apps. The spelling and sentences make it seem like itā€™s mostly kids, too.

    edit: hereā€™s a terrible example!

    • froztbyte@awful.systemsOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      Ā·
      4 months ago

      Yesterday I saw a link to some podcast/post float by, of an interview with some genml company ā€œdiscussing people falling in love with, having relations with, and even wanting to marryā€, where the ceo is ā€œokay with itā€. didnā€™t click because ugh, but will see if I can find it

      and ofc all these weird fucking things will pop the moment their vc runs out or openai raises prices or whatever. bet you they donā€™t have any therapy contingency for helping people with their ai partners suddenly getting vc-raptured

      • Mii@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        Ā·
        4 months ago

        I remember 15 years ago when I read about a Japanese man marrying a character from a dating sim game (source, archive link).

        The internet clowned on him, but he was very serious, and it was the first time when I realized that these ā€œanime waifuā€ people probably arenā€™t all just taking the piss.

        Thereā€™s a whole socio-economic angle there, of course, which I donā€™t think I wanna get into here, but to me this whole ā€œAI girlfriendā€ market really seems like a low-effort take on ā€œdating sim as a serviceā€ with as much game removed as possible but the exploitative nature turned up to fucking eleven.

        • imadabouzu@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          Ā·
          4 months ago

          The weird thing, is. From my perspective. Nearly every, weird, cringy, niche internet addiction Iā€™ve ever seen or partaken in myself, has produced both two things: people who live through it and their perspective widens, and people who donā€™t.

          Like, I look back at my days of spending 2 days at a time binge playing World of Warcraft with a deep sense of cringe but also a smirk because I survived and I self regulated, and honestly. Made a couple of lifetime friends. Like whatever response we have to anime waifus, I hope we still recognize the humanity in being a thing that wants to be entertained or satisfied.

    • FredFig@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      Ā·
      4 months ago

      Itā€™s really funny that this was probably the closest thing to a killer app powered by genAI to exist.

      Wonder if theyā€™re getting rid of this stuff because they realized itā€™s actually a liability to mine these ERP convos for data and theyā€™re burning money on every conversation as it is.

      • froztbyte@awful.systemsOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        Ā·
        4 months ago

        post still seems up here. try old.reddit if attempting to view from mobile (the ā€œnewā€ reddit site is remarkably rabid on mobile)

        • V0ldek@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          Ā·
          4 months ago

          Thereā€™s a link to what appears to have been a picture (reddit.com/gallery) but itā€™s dead. If you go through ā€œnewā€ Reddit it just says ā€œremoved by moderatorsā€.

          I canā€™t really tell what this is about from ā€œwe HAVE to do something about thisā€ when ā€œthisā€ is an empty space :/

          • hrrrngh@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            Ā·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Oh whoops, I should have archived it.

            There were about 7 images posted of users roleplaying with bots, all ending with a bot response that cut off halfway with an error message that read ā€œThis content may violate our policies; blablabla; please use the report button if you believe this is a false positive and we will investigate.ā€ The last one was some kind of parody image making fun of the warning.

            Most of them were some kind of romantic roleplay with bad spelling. One was like, ā€œi run my hand down your arm and kiss youā€, and the bots response triggered the warning. Another one was like, ā€œ*is slapped in the face* itā€™s okay, I still love youā€ and the rest of the message generated a warning. There wasnā€™t enough context for that one, so the person might have been writing it playfully (?), but that subreddit has a lot of blatant sexual violence regardless.

  • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    Ā·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    yall might want to take notice of this thing https://discuss.tchncs.de/post/20460779

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2024-08-14/Recent_research

    STORM: AI agents role-play as ā€œWikipedia editorsā€ and ā€œexpertsā€ to create Wikipedia-like articles, a more sophisticated effort than previous auto-generation systems

    ai slop in extruded text form, now longer and worse! and burns extra square kilometers of rainforest

      • imadabouzu@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        Ā·
        4 months ago

        LLM, tell me the most obviously persuasive sort of science devoid of context. Historically, thatā€™s been super helpful so letā€™s do more of that.

    • self@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      Ā·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      we propose the STORM paradigm for the Synthesis of Topic Outlines through Retrieval and Multi-perspective Question Asking

      oh come the fuck on

      The authors hail from Monica S. Lamā€™s group at Stanford, which has also published several other papers involving LLMs and Wikimedia projects since 2023 (see our previous coverage: WikiChat, ā€œthe first few-shot LLM-based chatbot that almost never hallucinatesā€ ā€“ a paper that received the Wikimedia Foundationā€™s ā€œResearch Award of the Yearā€ some weeks ago).

      from the same minds as STOTRMPQA comes: we constructed this LLM so it wonā€™t generate a response unless similar text appears in the Wikipedia corpus and now it almost never entirely fucks up. award-winning!

  • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    Ā·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    chechen warlord ramzan kadyrov brags about cybertruck technical and praises musk for allegedly giving him it in grozny (take it with a heap of salt, like everything that clown says). they want to send it to the frontline armed with nothing more than NSV (think soviet M2 Browning) https://xcancel.com/NOELreports/status/1824820843463000392#m

    Kadyrov claimed that Elon Musk supposedly gave him a Cybertruck in Grozny. According to Kadyrov, he plans to send this armed vehicle to the ā€œSVOā€ zone.

    ā€œI express my sincere gratitude to Elon Musk! This is, of course, the strongest genius of our time and a specialist. Great man! Well, the cybertruck turned out to be a powerful project. Undoubtedly one of the best cars in the world! I literally fell in love with this car.ā€

    would be a nice future addition to oryxā€™s list, if they actually put it outside of chechenya

    • gerikson@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      Ā·
      4 months ago

      I did not have Musk x Kadyrov on my 2024 bingo card.

      Not really sure if this is actionable sanctions-busting. It would be hilarious if so. Even more hilarious if Ukraine captures it and sticks into the victory museum.

    • YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      Ā·
      4 months ago

      Given how it was marketed Iā€™m surprised we didnā€™t see cybertechnicals out of some stateside militia group somewhere, though I guess not currently having dictatorial power forces them to have better opsec.

      Either way this things gonna light up FIRMS like itā€™s a one-vehicle ammo depot if/when it goes up.

      • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        Ā·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        cybertruck just plainly sucks as a base for technical. iā€™m almost certain that it canā€™t stop 5.56 (or 5.45) or anything bigger, or bigger fragmentation, windows are not bulletproof, it will get mauled by AT mines and maybe even some AP ones, lithium battery can catch fire, it has limited range, canā€™t be refueled quickly, probably canā€™t be repaired in field, canā€™t haul anything, its frame is brittle, it rusts, itā€™s shiny, itā€™s probably quite loud in radio spectrum. kadyrov mounted 12.7mm HMG which itself is fine as a weapon but woefully underpowered alone for frontline service, at least needs some additional antitank weapon - maybe it wonā€™t ever see tanks, but itā€™s still useful against fortifications, BMPs, MTLBs and the like

        but this wonā€™t ever happen, because this thing is for celebratory joyrides in grozny and firing that 12.7mm hmg up in the air, as a local custom

          • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            Ā·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            biggest difference is that kadyrovs teip (sorta like clan) is not independent, theyā€™re just paid off by putin to fuck off and not cause trouble. theyā€™re doing this since end of second chechen war, when kadyrovs were installed as chechen leaders sympathetic to putin. which is direct source of all these funds that he put into building a motherfucking palace with a moat (where that video is filmed)

            but other than that, son of warlord from Lord of War is pretty similar to irl Kadyrov, down to armor piercing ammo belt he wears there (black tips)

  • gerikson@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    Ā·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Babe, new AI doom vector just dropped: AGI will corrupt knitting sites so crafters make Langford visual hack patterns![1]

    https://www.zdnet.com/article/how-ai-scams-are-infiltrating-the-knitting-and-crochet-world/


    [1] doom scenario is my interpretation, not actually included in ZDnet article.

    Sadly, Langford hacks seem to have never achieved memetic takeoff. Having an internet legally enforced on pain of death to be text-only would probably be a good thing.

    comp.basilisk.faq