They say that GNU is spreading misinformation and “stop getting info from charlatans”?

  • alonely0@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 months ago

    Graphene is against GNU ideals getting in the way of security, because as it turns out, they do. FSF’s definition of “ok” and “not ok” firmware blobs is bogus anyway.

    • PullPantsUnsworn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      FSF does not get in the way of security. FSF believes source code should be publicly available in order to even assume the software is secure or private. In a perfect world that would be nice. But in the real world, proprietary blobs are required to make the hardware functional. As long as OEMs are removed about open sourcing the firmwares, both GrapheneOS and GNU are right in their own way.

    • ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Graphene is against GNU ideals getting in the way of security,

      Funny, Graphene’s obsession with security is getting in the way of my ideals.

      Fuck Google and their proprietary security updates. I want no Google in my life and if that means a bit less security, I’m okay with that. In fact, I’d argue that running Google code that does who-knows-what for your security is itself not a very safe thing to do.