• Harvey656@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Hard agree.

    As someone that grew up most of my life in a tiny, rural Ohio area. There are so many strange laws that extend from the cities, many of which can outright just be bad for the area.

    Policy wise, local democrats are rarely liked and seen as weak in rural areas, which in my experience is usually correct, unfortunately. The Republicans are always money grabbers but generally get things done.

    Frankly the system sucks.

    • brygphilomena@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      Honestly, it’s wild when I get into a policy debate and from someone’s stance I can tell whether they live in a city, in the country, in suburbs, or whatever. Its hard to argue policy when people refuse to acknowledge that there are other parts of the country that aren’t like the neighborhood they live in.

      From my understanding, which I admit could be flawed, that is why there is the separation of federal, state, and local government.

      Federal deals with the big shit across the country but doesn’t get caught up in the small shit that only applies to Montana. It also acts as the check and balance to state laws to prevent them from being too egregious.

      • Harvey656@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah, I think that’s how the separation is supposed to work. That being said, seems like the supreme court keeps poking it’s nose where it doesn’t belong. But all I can really do is complain on a lesser used website and vote.

        Also, side note, how is Montana? I live in Texas atm, cause I followed my fiance down here, and it sucks. But we eventually want to get a house and may not stay here.

        • brygphilomena@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          I recently moved from California to Illinois.

          I just used Montana since it’s a low population density state.

          I mostly liked California. Other than the CARB restrictions on cars, most of its legislation just let me live my life in peace. But liking to modify cars put me at odds with the emissions laws. It’s not like I was poluting heavily, it’s just that I needed a custom tune to burn fuel efficiently when I had done an engine swap. They won’t even measure the emissions anymore and just have “approved” ECU codes they test for. California is just very expensive, too expensive for buying a home for me right now.

          Illinois is good too, at least in the Chicago suburbs. I can hop on a train and go downtown any time I want, I’ve got good schools, good community, and lots to do.

          • Harvey656@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            I’ll have to look into Illinois, I’m originally from Ohio, and oh boy let me tell you, I hate Columbus. It’s practically half of the state at this point. And that sucks, the extended area is seriously changing how Ohio looks, so many suburbs, so many factories.