• J Lou@mastodon.socialOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    The statement is only generates a contradiction if there is an omniscient being. If there are no omniscient beings, it is consistent.

    The idea is that it is impossible for a being to both know and not know something. Knowable is not the same as known to a particular being

    @atheistmemes

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      If there is an omniscient being, the statement is known. It’s internal inconsistency doesn’t make it unknowable. Omniscience isn’t bound by strict semantic logic.

      Like, I couldn’t disprove you exist by saying “You don’t know this statement is true.”