I would definitely not use any technologies that use internet or can be hacked remotely. But I would accept some that would help my life significantly.

  • !ozoned@lemmy.world@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’ve seen code. I want nothing.

    We already have people getting implants and companies leave the space for go belly up and you’re stuck with a useless piece of plastic in you. No thank you.

    • parrot-party@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Or, possibly worse, companies changing terms after the fact. Who knows when they decide to start upcharging for a feature you got for free before. Or they “upgrade” something and start collecting data that you didn’t originally consent to. Giving up part of your body to a soulless corporate whore sounds like a nightmare. I would only approve of things I could remove myself should they become problematic.

    • paperclipgroove@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      This is a nightmare scenario.

      It’s bad enough when you get something cloud connected and the company disappears, leaving you with expensive e-waste.

      Now it’s in your body and you likely have to pay to remove it (plus surgery risks) or leave it there knowing no one will help cover costs if there are complications from it.

      😬

  • skulblaka@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I just want non-volatile storage. Give me a hard drive that I can read and write to. Use it for to-do lists, or grocery lists. Instead of physically reading a book with my eyes just upload it to my drive and peruse it at my leisure inside my own head. Recipes go there. Even if it’s text-only I can think of a million uses for it. Add the ability to store and retrieve images or videos and it gets even better. My memory isn’t that great and the sheer increase in quality of life that it could give me would be astronomical.

  • Scourge@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 years ago

    I would pretty much accept any technology that brings me closer to being a full android or lengthens my lifespan. Artificial brain, tracking tech, etc. I would be willing to accept a lot of compromise for eternal life and I feel this route is probably has the best chance of actually happening within my lifespan. Cyberhorror aspects aside, I figure once the lifespan increases, given an infinite period of time eventually the problems will sort itself out. If it gets too awful I assume I could probably maintain enough control to off myself at some point so it’s all good.

    Also, I know the chances are still very small, fractions of a percent or whatever, but its non-zero and most other avenues seem to be just flat zero outright.

    • SubmarineDoor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      The problem with immortality is the damaging century long conservatism of society it would cause. Imagine a few rich immortals in charge of everything forever. Some scientists joke that “science progresses one funeral at a time”. Well imagine a society where the arts, sciences and the economy never change.

    • DarkenLM@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Immortality is not a gift. It’s a curse. The problems won’t go away, they’d only increase. Death is the Great Equalizer. If we remove it, balance is removed as well.

  • wheatbreaddasbootpie@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    The ability to download knowledge to your brain (like in The Matrix). Doesn’t have to require internet, can be a plugin sort of thing (not as intense as The Matrix being at the base of the skull)

    • JasonMaggini@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      There was a description in a book, wish I could remember which (most likely William Gibson) where a character pops in a chip so they can speak another language. The description of the information unfolding in their brain was really cool.

  • Harlan_Cloverseed@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I would do display contact lenses if the experience could approximate current vr /ar tech. I’d feel hesitant about surgical implants.

    • s804@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      definitely. if its lenses that you can just remove i think it would be fine by me, but no surgery for things like that, too sketchy

  • Senseibull@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    Mind reading blocking shield to counteract the future tech that’s being developed.

    Bionic eyes

  • WallCactus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’ll take a cybernetic heart. I was born with a heart defect, and one heart attack was enough for me. I’d love to know what it felt like to have endurance too.

  • lp0101@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’ll go for something simple and possibly more realistic. Just give me a programmable NFT implant on the back of my hand or something that i can use to pay for things, open doors, unlock computers, etc

  • cyberfae@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    I would really like some kind of augmented reality device that adds an RPG like interface to real life. Especially some kind of quest management system to keep track of tasks and display my current objective to the side. This combined with an xp system could help me gamify tasks at least to tha point of being bearable. Meters for vitals would also come in handy as I often forget to eat and drink, but I don’t have this issue when playing survival games for some reason.

  • mrbubblesort@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    There’s just so much that can go wrong with it that I don’t trust it at all. Even the best, most well tested systems have bugs and critical flaws.

    But then also there’s he worry that the company making whatever you use goes under or stops supporting it. Imagine getting a message one day like “We’re sorry, but we will no longer support the SuperEye 5400TL API after June 30th. If you wish to keep your sight, please purchase our newest model, the 6400TLX, from our website and choose the subscription plan that is right for you!”