Currently downvotes are enabled on a trial basis, this was done by me to see if they can be enabled to prevent spam from rising to the top of communities, along with the fact that is another form of interaction/feedback.

However I’ve gotten some pushback for this and so I’d like to see the general consensus of this decision. Please put any comments/concerns in this thread, and please vote here: https://forms.gle/zqDxemJCiTAXJi5i9

the results of this poll and the comments will determine if we keep or remove downvotes again

  • lnsfw3@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    This is the important part:

    Especially bad for gonewild posts where people’s self image gets involved.

    We don’t need a “go away, you’re ugly” button. That’s what blocking is for.

    • morphballganon@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Hm… what if downvoting was weighted only 1/10th as much as upvoting? So a few downvotes here and there from people doing it wrong wouldn’t amount to anything in others’ view, but if a post is heavily downvoted due to being in the wrong community or low effort, that’s visible?

      • lnsfw3@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Maybe? I dunno. Turning off downvotes seems like a pretty simple solution. Trying to come up with complex ways to make it hurt just the right amount doesn’t seem like it’ll work in all cases.

        • morphballganon@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          It’s called fine-tuning, and if everyone gave up that easily, many domains would suffer, like medicine, architecture, manufacturing design etc. Don’t be afraid of something simply because the ideal fix is more complicated than 2+2.