Another remaster that misses the point
Today Blizzard announced remasters of its classic fantasy real-time strategy hits Warcraft I&II, the games that put it on the map in the distant, functional past of the â90s. I should be celebrating; the second Warcraft as unequivocally my favorite game as a young child. I spent God only knows how many hundreds of hours playing it, and even He eventually got bored of watching me make my own horrible little maps and walked away. These remasters, though? They ainât it.
Iâll preface this by saying that Iâm very glad these classics remain playable. Iâm sure Blizzardâs making a pretty penny off doing so, but at least itâs keeping its history alive. That said, I will be playing these re-releases with the new graphics turned off, because just look at them:
Warcraft Remastered Battle Chest Launch Trailer
The art looks basic and generic where the original pixels inspired imagination, letting your mind fill in the gaps of these unitsâ physical features. Some, like Ogres and Ogre Magi, appeared almost photorealistic to young me, who sought to recreate them (over and over and over) in drawings and other, larger-scale art projects. In trying to more fully inhabit this universe whose collection of Little Guys inspired me to dare to dream, I constructed life-sized (relative to an eight-year-old) paper dolls of nearly every unit in the game. It was my Everest, entirely because â again â the original game left room for interpretation.
Now admittedly, Iâm no longer a small child fueled entirely by starry-eyed wonder, and thatâs definitely part of the problem. But Warcraftâs original look was a product of its limitations, and trying to pave over that with plastic-y sheen is a mistake. I donât know who the new graphics are for â I doubt these old games are going to lure in many new players, especially with art that looks like it belongs in a vastly less-intricate game than Warcraft â but itâs certainly not me.
I refuse to click links of articles written from Grayson, a âjournalistâ that even on the niche games reporting field managed to break every single item of the journalism code of ethics https://www.spj.org/ethicscode.asp
Boycott bloggers stealing jobs from real journalists.
Get your unwashed gamergate ass out of here.
Lol, thatâs rich coming from an enabler of genocide.
Well, this took a quick turn into Godwinâs Law faster than Iâve ever seen.
I donât know anything about Grayson or why someone would have an issue with him, but youâve made it very clear very quickly that youâre not providing view points worth looking into, so thank you for that.
Not only do you not know what Goodwinâs law is, you took time to reply to a worthless take? How little do you value your time and opinions that youâd go out of your way to deride mine?
you took time to reply to a worthless take? How little do you value your time and opinions that youâd go out of your way to deride mine?
No u
As if I have any control over genocide. I voted against the fascist, at least.
You could only vote for fascists. One personable, one arse-hole, both as fascist as they come.
An unironic âboth sidesâ. How original.
I have no intentions of looking at your profile, so Iâll assume youâre joking. Because I prefer that option.
In either case, one of those candidates will be worse for Palestinians, LGBTQ folks, women, the climate, etc⊠I actually care about those groups and causes.
Lol, quite literally this week Biden went back on his word on the export block of weapons to Israel. From the outside looking in, thereâs no difference.
So even if I were to grant that on Israel/Palestine they were no different (which I donât), weâre going to throw all of those other groups and causes under the bus?