• finley@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    If you no longer have free speech, how are you posting here, whining about this?

        • tomi000@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 minutes ago

          It isnt, but if it were your argument would still not be valid. Just because free speech is violated doesnt mean you cant say anything anywhere.

  • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Okay, let’s be fucking real here. This is not a first amendment issue at all. Never has been, never will be.

    There’s no constitutional lawyers making that claim that don’t work for someone paying them to.

    Nobody’s speech is being limited. One specific platform is being removed. One of many. That’s it.

  • Majorllama@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I’m a free speed absolutionist, but this ain’t an infringement of our free speech. If TikTok had been government hosted and they closed it down because they didn’t like what the users were saying then you could absolutely make that argument.

    TikTok was owned by a Chinese company and it’s not the only app of its kind.